Some excerpts from DoD-GEIS Influenza Programs, Strengthening Global Surveillance and Response (2008)
(( This review was done by a committee from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) primarily to review how the programs were functioning after an influx of $39 million dollars allocated by Congress as part of the 2006 National Defense Authorization Act. The IOM was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the
services of appropriate professionals in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public.))
""In 1996, the Executive Office of the President of the United States issued a Presidential Decision Directive declaring that national and international capabilities for infectious disease surveillance, prevention, and response were insufficient to protect the health of US citizens from emerging infectious diseases and called on US federal agencies to remedy the situation. The Department of Defense (DoD) Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (GEIS), established in 1997, represents the DoD's response to that Presidential Decision Directive. GEIS's focus is primarily on sentinel surveillance of indigenous and expatriate populations for certain infectious disease targets, including influenza. For many decades the DoD has maintained a series of overseas medical research facilities in Asia, Africa, and Latin America that have been well poised to participate in the detection of emerging infectious disease threats. Collectively, these DoD facilities constitute an extraordianry array of surveillance assets.
In 2006, through the National Defense Authorization Act, Congress provided a $39 million supplement to GEIS, specifically to expand surveillance and response capabilities with respect to the threat of pandemic influenza of avian virus origin. An IOM Comittee was assembled at the request of the DoD to evaluate how the GEIS pandemic influenza surveillance and response program utilized the supplemental funds, strengthened influenza surveillance efforts domestically and internationally, integrated DoD efforts with those of other Federal agencies, coordinated activities with host countries (and neighboring countries in regional efforts), and collaborated with the World Health Organization and other international agencies engaged in influenza pandemic preparedness. Toward this end, a Committee was assembled with expertise in influenza, epidemiology, public health laboratory management, virology, veterinary and human medicine, global health and military preventive medicine. The Committee made site visits to the DoD overseas medical research units where GEIS-supported projects are under way, as well as to key military medical laboratories within the United States involved in influenza surveillance. The findings of the Committee are summarized in this report, along with a series of recommendations.
The Committee found that the DoD's overseas medical research units constitute an impressive network that has laudably utilized the supplemental funding to strengthen influenza surveillance, in addition to continuing their historically primary research activities. Perhaps the Committee's most overarching recommendation is that DoD-GEIS
headquarters should be formally charged with providing overall managerial and technical oversight (quality assurance, safety, etc.) and interagency communication for the multi-service influenza and respiratory disease surveillance program and the revised coordination structure. Part of this should be a codified chain of accountability to include timely reporting of findings. If the full set of recommendations are acted upon, the Committee is confident that the DoD-GEIS's key role in global surveillance will be further strengthened and its effectivensss enhanced.""
""Institutionalizing influenza surveillance in host countries and within the populations of these host countries provides DoD-GEIS laboatories with opportunities to assist host governments in using the data to prioritize future surveillance activities. Expanding the scope of data collection and analysis to look beyond H5N1 and developoing surveillance activities that are amenable to other emerging diseases would greatly benefit overall public health capacity.""
""For several weeks in October 1918 the influenza pandemic was causing 5,000 to 6,000 deaths each week in the US Army""
The book has separate chapters dealing with the lab systems in Indonesia, Thailand, Egypt, Kenya, Peru, San Diego and San Antonio.
The recommendations largely revolve around increasing lab capacity and expertise and surge capacity and in increasing coordination within the lab system (Army, Navy and Air Force) and between DoD-GEIS and other US partners including HHS, CDC, the NIH, FDA, USDA, the Department of State, the US Agency for International Development, the Department of Homeland Security and other relevant US government efforts as well as various international oganizations.
""National Stategy for Pandemic Influenza Implementation Plan Roles and Responsibilities
The Secretary of Homeland Security will be responsible for coordination of the federal response as provided by the National Strategy for Pandemic Inflluenza (Strategy), and will support the Secretary of Health and Human Services' coordination of overall public health and medical emergency response efforts.
The Secretary of Health and Human Services will be responsible for the overall coordination of the public health and medical emergency response during a pandemic.
The Secretary of Defense will be responsible for protecting American interests at home and abroad.
The Secretary of Transportation will be responsible for coordination of the transportation sector.
The Secretary of Agriculture will be responsible for overall coordination of veterinary response to a domestic animal outbreak of a pandemic virus or virus with pandemic potential and ongoing surveillance for influenza in domestic animals and animal products.
The Secretary of the Treasury will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the economic impacts of the pandemic and will help formulate the economic policy response and advise on the likely economic impacts of containment efforts.""
""Military forces in a number of developing countries work closely with their ministries of health to help to strengthen their infectious disease surveillance and control programs. In turn, a number of activities performed by the DoD overseas laboratories are done so in collaboration with the host-country military, and two of these five laboratories are hosted by the foreign militaries: the Peruvian Navy hosts NMRCD in Lima and the Royal Thai Army (RTA) hosts AFRIMS in Bangkok. Examples of their collaborative efforts include a unit-based surveillance system developed by RTA and AFRIMS to improve infectious disease surveillance in remote areas of Thailand along the country's borders with Cambodia and the Lao People's Democratic Republic and also an electronic disease surveillance system, Alerta, developed by the Peruvian Navy and NMRCD. Before the development of this system, the Peruvian Navy had relied on a time-consuming paper-based reporting system. (Chretien JP, et al 2007. The importance of militaries from developing countries in global infectious disease surveillance. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 85(3): 174-180)""
Committee members:
Myron M. Levine MD, DTPH (Chair) Professor and Director, Simon and Bessie Grollman Distinguished Professor, Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine
Carol Cardona, DVM, PhD Associate Veterinarian, Associate Specialist in Cooperative Extension, Veterinary Medicine Extension, University of California, Davis
Walter Dowdle, PhD The Task Force for Child Survival and Development
Timothy Germann, PhD Technical Staff Member, Applied Science & Methods Development Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Mary Gilchrist, PhD Director, Bureau of Laboratory Sciences, State Laboratory Institute, Department of Public Health, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
James M. Hughes MD Director, Program in Global Infectious Disease, Center for Global Safe Water, School of Medicine and Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
K. Mills McNeill, PhD MD Director, Public Health Laboratory, Mississippi State Department of Health
Peter Palese, PhD Professor and Chair Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Kennedy Francis Shortridge, PhD, DSc Emeritus Professor, The University of Hong Kong and Honorary Professor, Department of Microbiolgy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China, Honorary Professor, Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
James Tibenderana, MBCHB, MPhil, PhD Drug Policy Change Specialist/Epidemiologist Malaria Consortium, Uganda
Board Liaison
Philip K. Russell, MD (Board on Global Health Liaison) Former Director, Office of Research and Development Coordination, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Health Emergency Preparedness, US Department of Health and Human Services
(( This review was done by a committee from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) primarily to review how the programs were functioning after an influx of $39 million dollars allocated by Congress as part of the 2006 National Defense Authorization Act. The IOM was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the
services of appropriate professionals in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public.))
""In 1996, the Executive Office of the President of the United States issued a Presidential Decision Directive declaring that national and international capabilities for infectious disease surveillance, prevention, and response were insufficient to protect the health of US citizens from emerging infectious diseases and called on US federal agencies to remedy the situation. The Department of Defense (DoD) Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (GEIS), established in 1997, represents the DoD's response to that Presidential Decision Directive. GEIS's focus is primarily on sentinel surveillance of indigenous and expatriate populations for certain infectious disease targets, including influenza. For many decades the DoD has maintained a series of overseas medical research facilities in Asia, Africa, and Latin America that have been well poised to participate in the detection of emerging infectious disease threats. Collectively, these DoD facilities constitute an extraordianry array of surveillance assets.
In 2006, through the National Defense Authorization Act, Congress provided a $39 million supplement to GEIS, specifically to expand surveillance and response capabilities with respect to the threat of pandemic influenza of avian virus origin. An IOM Comittee was assembled at the request of the DoD to evaluate how the GEIS pandemic influenza surveillance and response program utilized the supplemental funds, strengthened influenza surveillance efforts domestically and internationally, integrated DoD efforts with those of other Federal agencies, coordinated activities with host countries (and neighboring countries in regional efforts), and collaborated with the World Health Organization and other international agencies engaged in influenza pandemic preparedness. Toward this end, a Committee was assembled with expertise in influenza, epidemiology, public health laboratory management, virology, veterinary and human medicine, global health and military preventive medicine. The Committee made site visits to the DoD overseas medical research units where GEIS-supported projects are under way, as well as to key military medical laboratories within the United States involved in influenza surveillance. The findings of the Committee are summarized in this report, along with a series of recommendations.
The Committee found that the DoD's overseas medical research units constitute an impressive network that has laudably utilized the supplemental funding to strengthen influenza surveillance, in addition to continuing their historically primary research activities. Perhaps the Committee's most overarching recommendation is that DoD-GEIS
headquarters should be formally charged with providing overall managerial and technical oversight (quality assurance, safety, etc.) and interagency communication for the multi-service influenza and respiratory disease surveillance program and the revised coordination structure. Part of this should be a codified chain of accountability to include timely reporting of findings. If the full set of recommendations are acted upon, the Committee is confident that the DoD-GEIS's key role in global surveillance will be further strengthened and its effectivensss enhanced.""
""Institutionalizing influenza surveillance in host countries and within the populations of these host countries provides DoD-GEIS laboatories with opportunities to assist host governments in using the data to prioritize future surveillance activities. Expanding the scope of data collection and analysis to look beyond H5N1 and developoing surveillance activities that are amenable to other emerging diseases would greatly benefit overall public health capacity.""
""For several weeks in October 1918 the influenza pandemic was causing 5,000 to 6,000 deaths each week in the US Army""
The book has separate chapters dealing with the lab systems in Indonesia, Thailand, Egypt, Kenya, Peru, San Diego and San Antonio.
The recommendations largely revolve around increasing lab capacity and expertise and surge capacity and in increasing coordination within the lab system (Army, Navy and Air Force) and between DoD-GEIS and other US partners including HHS, CDC, the NIH, FDA, USDA, the Department of State, the US Agency for International Development, the Department of Homeland Security and other relevant US government efforts as well as various international oganizations.
""National Stategy for Pandemic Influenza Implementation Plan Roles and Responsibilities
The Secretary of Homeland Security will be responsible for coordination of the federal response as provided by the National Strategy for Pandemic Inflluenza (Strategy), and will support the Secretary of Health and Human Services' coordination of overall public health and medical emergency response efforts.
The Secretary of Health and Human Services will be responsible for the overall coordination of the public health and medical emergency response during a pandemic.
The Secretary of Defense will be responsible for protecting American interests at home and abroad.
The Secretary of Transportation will be responsible for coordination of the transportation sector.
The Secretary of Agriculture will be responsible for overall coordination of veterinary response to a domestic animal outbreak of a pandemic virus or virus with pandemic potential and ongoing surveillance for influenza in domestic animals and animal products.
The Secretary of the Treasury will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the economic impacts of the pandemic and will help formulate the economic policy response and advise on the likely economic impacts of containment efforts.""
""Military forces in a number of developing countries work closely with their ministries of health to help to strengthen their infectious disease surveillance and control programs. In turn, a number of activities performed by the DoD overseas laboratories are done so in collaboration with the host-country military, and two of these five laboratories are hosted by the foreign militaries: the Peruvian Navy hosts NMRCD in Lima and the Royal Thai Army (RTA) hosts AFRIMS in Bangkok. Examples of their collaborative efforts include a unit-based surveillance system developed by RTA and AFRIMS to improve infectious disease surveillance in remote areas of Thailand along the country's borders with Cambodia and the Lao People's Democratic Republic and also an electronic disease surveillance system, Alerta, developed by the Peruvian Navy and NMRCD. Before the development of this system, the Peruvian Navy had relied on a time-consuming paper-based reporting system. (Chretien JP, et al 2007. The importance of militaries from developing countries in global infectious disease surveillance. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 85(3): 174-180)""
Committee members:
Myron M. Levine MD, DTPH (Chair) Professor and Director, Simon and Bessie Grollman Distinguished Professor, Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine
Carol Cardona, DVM, PhD Associate Veterinarian, Associate Specialist in Cooperative Extension, Veterinary Medicine Extension, University of California, Davis
Walter Dowdle, PhD The Task Force for Child Survival and Development
Timothy Germann, PhD Technical Staff Member, Applied Science & Methods Development Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Mary Gilchrist, PhD Director, Bureau of Laboratory Sciences, State Laboratory Institute, Department of Public Health, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
James M. Hughes MD Director, Program in Global Infectious Disease, Center for Global Safe Water, School of Medicine and Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
K. Mills McNeill, PhD MD Director, Public Health Laboratory, Mississippi State Department of Health
Peter Palese, PhD Professor and Chair Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Kennedy Francis Shortridge, PhD, DSc Emeritus Professor, The University of Hong Kong and Honorary Professor, Department of Microbiolgy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China, Honorary Professor, Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
James Tibenderana, MBCHB, MPhil, PhD Drug Policy Change Specialist/Epidemiologist Malaria Consortium, Uganda
Board Liaison
Philip K. Russell, MD (Board on Global Health Liaison) Former Director, Office of Research and Development Coordination, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Health Emergency Preparedness, US Department of Health and Human Services
Comment