Check out the FAQ,Terms of Service & Disclaimers by clicking the
link. Please register
to be able to post. By viewing this site you are agreeing to our Terms of Service and Acknowledge our Disclaimers.
FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster.
The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website.
By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Homologous Recombination is Very Rare or Absent in Human Influenza A Virus
Re: Homologous Recombination is Very Rare or Absent in Human Influenza A Virus
Commentary
Recombination Analysis In Human Influenza
Recombinomics Commentary 18:48
March 26, 2008
Using an exhaustive search and a nonparametric test for mosaic structure, we identified 315 sequences (~2% in five different RNA segments that, after a multiple comparisons correction, had statistically significant mosaic signals compatible with homologous recombination.
More controversial, however, is the occurrence of homologous recombination in influenza viruses, most likely involving copy-choice (template-switching) replication of RNA molecules that co-infect a single cell. Although bioinformatic evidence for homologous recombination has been suggested (13, 19), these results remain unsubstantiated, with extensive lineage-specific rate variation a likely source of a false-positive signal for at least some putative recombination events (24, 31).
The above comments from the upcoming paper, “Homologous Recombination is Very Rare or Absent in Human Influenza A Virus”, describe the detection of small stretches of genetic information consistent with homologous recombination. The comments also note the presence of much longer regions of recombination in Canadian swine, although the possibility of differential evolution within a gene is cited as an explanation for the differential patterns of polymorphisms.
However, the differential evolution was discounted in the swine paper, because much of the divergence exactly matched early swine isolates and the crossover points varied, signaling independent recombination events.
The paper on the human influenza sequences however, failed to find longer stretches of recombination. Only two examples were found, and the authors suggest those two examples may have been due to contamination and the recombinant sequences may have been generated during amplification.
However, the detection of longer examples of recombination was limited by restrictions on the dataset being tested. Only full human sequences were used, which excluded sequences with clear examples of recombination. Moreover, the requirement of full sequences eliminated one set of parental sequences for the recombinants
The clear recombination involved a series of six HA sequences from Korea in 2002. The first and last third of the gene match contemporary H3N2 sequences, but the middle third of the genes match HA from sequences from isolates collected a decade earlier. The earlier origin, and the small differences in the recombined region of the six isolates reduced the likelihood that the recombined region was due to laboratory contamination.
In addition, the analysis did not include swine or avian sequences, which are frequent donor sequences for seasonal flu. Since the study focused on the recombinant as well as both parental sequences, the exclusion of swine and avian sequences would further reduce the number of recombinants identified using the criteria in the paper.
Similarly, the paper did not analyze recombination in avian or swine influenza.
Last edited by sharon sanders; March 26, 2008, 02:33 PM.
Reason: fixed color of quote
Re: Homologous Recombination is Very Rare or Absent in Human Influenza A Virus
they don't talk much about those short recombination signals,
how strong they were or if there were more than statistically
expected. (they should have told us)
There is quite some diversity in human flu and the flu travels
around the globe, so the concentration on US and NZ
sequences is not so severe.
And even with the Korean sequences, there is still much
less recombination in human flu than in swine or birds.
Why ?
Is the same true for reassortment ?
they don't talk much about those short recombination signals,
how strong they were or if there were more than statistically
expected. (they should have told us)
There is quite some diversity in human flu and the flu travels
around the globe, so the concentration on US and NZ
sequences is not so severe.
And even with the Korean sequences, there is still much
less recombination in human flu than in swine or birds.
Why ?
Is the same true for reassortment ?
I posted the P values. For NA in H3N2 there were 240 examples. The p value was 1.2 X 10 to the -10 (the likelihood that the distribution was due to chance was 10 billion to 1).
they don't talk much about those short recombination signals,
how strong they were or if there were more than statistically
expected. (they should have told us)
There is quite some diversity in human flu and the flu travels
around the globe, so the concentration on US and NZ
sequences is not so severe.
And even with the Korean sequences, there is still much
less recombination in human flu than in swine or birds.
Why ?
Is the same true for reassortment ?
they don't talk much about those short recombination signals,
how strong they were or if there were more than statistically
expected. (they should have told us)
There is quite some diversity in human flu and the flu travels
around the globe, so the concentration on US and NZ
sequences is not so severe.
And even with the Korean sequences, there is still much
less recombination in human flu than in swine or birds.
Why ?
Is the same true for reassortment ?
I would put the recombination frequency much higher than reported. Almost all polymorphisms are in the database with regions of identity to allow for recombination.
That is what the travel logs are. They take a given polymorphisms and show its distribution in the database.
The name of the game is recombination, regardless of what it is called (mosaics or short regions, etc).
This isn't Kansas. Influenza knows how to rapidly evolve. When the recombiantion is between closely related sequences, the acquistions look like point mutations (or single nucleotide polymorphisms).
Most evolution is recombination and it is well controled, which is why I call it "elegant evolution".
they don't talk much about those short recombination signals,
how strong they were or if there were more than statistically
expected. (they should have told us)
There is quite some diversity in human flu and the flu travels
around the globe, so the concentration on US and NZ
sequences is not so severe.
And even with the Korean sequences, there is still much
less recombination in human flu than in swine or birds.
Why ?
Is the same true for reassortment ?
the two-breakpoint-recombinations, are they supposed
to happen
during one and the same replication
or
by two consecutive recombinations in different cells ?
Either is possible. In the same cell, if there is one recombination event, there really is no reason why there cannot be a second event. However, co-infections are common, so a second event can involve another host as well as another donor sequence.
When influenza is isolated, it comes with a history, which can involve multiple recombination events with multiple donor sequences.
The North Carolina sequence is at position 755-1594 in three isolates (11112, 57561, 56626)
In remains intact in 11112, but in 57561 and 56626 the Tennessee sequence is nested in the middle. Moreover, in 56626 it also has the 53518 sequence which has the same breakpoint.
Thus, the 2003/2004 Canadian swine isolates reflect a series on well defined (because they exactly match earlier isolates) recombination events.
how many recombination events ?
how many swine were involved ?
how many different (original,un-recombined) viruses were involved ?
(minimum)
since long recombined sequences are pretty rare we won't expect many
aaa+bbb+ccc ---> abc
(except maybe in Canadian swine,who are special)
Yes, the Candain swine represnt slow motion recombination. It is infrequent enough, so the long stretches remain, and are easily identified and confirmed.
Most of the time however, recombination is between closely related sequences, so the new acquistions just look like point mutations. However, when they are traced, the parental sequences can be identified.
That is why the travel logs form clear patterns and representing distribution routes. That is also why the same change appears on multiple backgrounds, like G743A on H5N1 in Egypt, Russia, Kuwait, Ghana and Nigeria at the same time.
Comment