Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SARS: Systematic Review of Treatment Effects

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SARS: Systematic Review of Treatment Effects

    SARS: Systematic Review of Treatment Effects
    Lauren J. Stockman, Richard Bellamy, Paul Garner

    Methods and Findings
    ...In total, 54 SARS treatment studies, 15 in vitro studies, and three acute respiratory distress syndrome studies met our inclusion criteria. Within in vitro studies, ribavirin, lopinavir, and type I IFN showed inhibition of SARS-CoV in tissue culture. In SARS-infected patient reports on ribavirin, 26 studies were classified as inconclusive, and four showed possible harm. Seven studies of convalescent plasma or IVIG, three of IFN type I, and two of LPV/r were inconclusive. In 29 studies of steroid use, 25 were inconclusive and four were classified as causing possible harm.

    Conclusions
    Despite an extensive literature reporting on SARS treatments, it was not possible to determine whether treatments benefited patients during the SARS outbreak. Some may have been harmful. Clinical trials should be designed to validate a standard protocol for dosage and timing, and to accrue data in real time during future outbreaks to monitor specific adverse effects and help inform treatment...
Working...
X