Re: Officials discuss animal die-off response
Oh, I miss the lastest developpement of this story.
PCR is my little speciality,
If I where you Florida1, I would asked if their H sub-typing PCR primer span the cleavage site.
I also would asked if they kept the resulting PCR fragment.
My fear I that the coexistence of two different strains of H5 in north america lead to the "recombination" of the high pathogenic strain cleavage site, I mean that it is not impossible that we could see the emergence of asiatic strain with a low cleavage site or North american strains with high pathogenic cleavage site.
H7 has notably this revertance capability and the two pathogenicity status can coexist in the same sample leading to one of them hinding the other in sequencing data...
http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11032
Maybe I extrapolate too much but with, those two brother H5 strains, the bad guy would be more hard to distinguish from the good guy.
It would be necessary to develop PCR primer that target directly the cleavage site, so even with a mix of strains we would be able to target the bad guy in the crowd.
Also, a real-time RT-PCR with a fluorogenic probe that target the Quigai classic cleavage site and theses variant would be able to acheive this.
That is what I did last fall, when I first started to be sensitised to the avian flu problematic.
I have the probe and primers but never tested them, and anyway we would not have legal right to acheive this I think so the project only "sleep" just in case a problem would emerge in the canadian swines where we really have legal disposition.
Anyway I feel more safe with that lab prep in our freezers, outbreak in north american swines with the circovirus problem would be a problem for lab technicians, given the fact that we do not work on level 3 security now.
And previous experience had show me that we may be in face of the problem well before the officials autority would be informed.
Oh, I miss the lastest developpement of this story.
PCR is my little speciality,
If I where you Florida1, I would asked if their H sub-typing PCR primer span the cleavage site.
I also would asked if they kept the resulting PCR fragment.
My fear I that the coexistence of two different strains of H5 in north america lead to the "recombination" of the high pathogenic strain cleavage site, I mean that it is not impossible that we could see the emergence of asiatic strain with a low cleavage site or North american strains with high pathogenic cleavage site.
H7 has notably this revertance capability and the two pathogenicity status can coexist in the same sample leading to one of them hinding the other in sequencing data...
http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11032
Maybe I extrapolate too much but with, those two brother H5 strains, the bad guy would be more hard to distinguish from the good guy.
It would be necessary to develop PCR primer that target directly the cleavage site, so even with a mix of strains we would be able to target the bad guy in the crowd.
Also, a real-time RT-PCR with a fluorogenic probe that target the Quigai classic cleavage site and theses variant would be able to acheive this.
That is what I did last fall, when I first started to be sensitised to the avian flu problematic.
I have the probe and primers but never tested them, and anyway we would not have legal right to acheive this I think so the project only "sleep" just in case a problem would emerge in the canadian swines where we really have legal disposition.
Anyway I feel more safe with that lab prep in our freezers, outbreak in north american swines with the circovirus problem would be a problem for lab technicians, given the fact that we do not work on level 3 security now.
And previous experience had show me that we may be in face of the problem well before the officials autority would be informed.
Comment