medpedia.com FluTrackers

Tracking Infectious Diseases since 2006

FluTrackers.com Inc. is a 501(c)(3) charity

Official PayPal Seal
H1N1 Swine Flu Information Información Gripe H1N1 Information Grippe H1N1 Influenza H1N1 Informazioni FluTrackers Latest Posts

www www.flutrackers.com



Go Back   FluTrackers > The Pandemic Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #91  
Old May 1st, 2009, 04:45 PM
cartski cartski is offline
Advisory Board
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 834
Default Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

Uhh, so the obvious question is what are the toilet facilities like in the mexican areas with high incidence? flush, outhouse, hole & pipe, "honey pot"....

And then are there reports of busted sewer pipes empyting out onto streets as was the case with the Amoy Gardens (?) and SARS?

And are there traps in the toilet pips in the apartments, the lack of which was also a factor creating negative pressure and bacteria in the Amoy Garden blocks.

It would be interesting to see a detailed geographic distribution of the cases in Mexico.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old May 1st, 2009, 05:16 PM
Dutchy's Avatar
Dutchy Dutchy is offline
Editor, Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 10,613
Default Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

If I understand well the possible problems caused by a pandemic:

from an individual point of view the most important thing is: will I or my dear ones fall ill and die?

From a national or global view the thing is: will many people, mild or not mild, fall ill at the same time? If so, there will be problems with infrastructure, infrastructure of everything (shops, energy, healthcare, you name it).

"Infrastructure" can't work without people. So if you have a shortage of people running all kinds of infrastructure , shortage through illness, or absentism, society can have a hard time to function like it does every day.

So from a general point of view it seems the point is'nt: "is it mild" , or "why worse in Mexico", or "what is the cfr" , but "is it contagious and spreading fast, making many victims" .

Time will tell.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old May 1st, 2009, 05:29 PM
vinny vinny is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 384
Default Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

Swine Flu Probe Slowed by Backlog in Mexican Sample Testing

May 1 (Bloomberg) -- Swine flu samples caught in a laboratory backlog in Mexico are slowing the probe into the severity of the virus that’s sweeping across the world, experts including the World Health Organization’s Francesco Checchi say.

Mexico, the first country known to be hit by the new H1N1 flu strain that has reached 11 nations, has about 35,000 samples waiting to be analyzed, said Dick Thompson, a spokesman at the World Health Organization. Those samples, which experts say hold the key to understanding the virus, are held in a guarded laboratory surrounded by walls, gates and guards, that’s less than 4 miles from downtown Mexico City.

The WHO on April 29 called a flu pandemic “imminent,” and 13 people are confirmed to have died from H1N1 infection. Scientists say they need to how far the virus has spread in Mexico, where 12 of the deaths occurred, and how often it kills, to predict whether it will be as lethal as the so-called Spanish flu that killed about 50 million people in 1918.

“While we know of a given number of confirmed swine flu deaths, we do not know by any means the actual number of swine influenza cases that have occurred in Mexico,” Checchi, a WHO epidemiologist, said in an April 28 e-mail. “It is extremely difficult to assess just how lethal the virus is in Mexico.”

Much more on
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...uDo&refer=home
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old May 2nd, 2009, 02:15 AM
gsgs's Avatar
gsgs gsgs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: germany
Posts: 8,620
Default Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

has it been mentioned ? :
Mexico is high above the sea-level, air is thinner

the other regions with outbreak are also high above sea-level ?


looking at niman's map ... all the Mexican outbreak regions seem to be high abov sea-level.
Can someone confirm ?


I speculate that the virus only transmits efficiently above sea-level and spreads
worse and is milder in other regions (in summer)


do we have a graphic program to superimpose niman's map with a sea-level-colored map ?
__________________
I'm interested in expert panflu damage estimates
my current links: http://bit.ly/hFI7H ILI-charts: http://bit.ly/CcRgT
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old May 2nd, 2009, 02:31 AM
AlaskaDenise's Avatar
AlaskaDenise AlaskaDenise is offline
Editor, Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,703
Default Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tropical View Post
Until now, influenza in the terms of seasonal flu, and pandemic flu, was always be a respiratory disease.

The various gastro versions until now fallen into "virosis", or "paraflu" (flu simil like).

Saying that influenza was some times an non respiratory disease seems something new for me, or maybe from all these proliferated bugs even that is now changing, and we will (if survived) starts sheding flu viruses like ducks ...?
It depends on the predominant binding receptors. a2,3 tend to bind to the intestines and lower lungs, while a2,6 tends to bind to upper respiratory.

In http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16022777...

Influenza A H5N1 replication sites in humans.

Quote:
Tissue tropism and pathogenesis of influenza A virus subtype H5N1 disease in humans is not well defined. In mammalian experimental models, H5N1 influenza is a disseminated disease. However, limited previous data from human autopsies have not shown evidence of virus dissemination beyond the lung. We investigated a patient with fatal H5N1 influenza. Viral RNA was detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in lung, intestine, and spleen tissues, but positive-stranded viral RNA indicating virus replication was confined to the lung and intestine. Viral antigen was detected in pneumocytes by immunohistochemical tests. Tumor necrosis factor-? mRNA was seen in lung tissue. In contrast to disseminated infection documented in other mammals and birds, H5N1 viral replication in humans may be restricted to the lung and intestine, and the major site of H5N1 viral replication in the lung is the pneumocyte.
Perhaps, (in my non-expert opinion) it is because H5N1 is still more avian, which has more a2,3 receptors.

However, various influenzas can contain a fair number of a2,3 receptors which yield intestinal symptoms.

.
__________________
"The next major advancement in the health of American people will be determined by what the individual is willing to do for himself"-- John Knowles, Former President of the Rockefeller Foundation
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old May 2nd, 2009, 04:15 AM
tropical tropical is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,705
Default Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

Thanks AD and hello,

I'm aware of the receptors throat/lung story about bird flu (learned at FT/...).
Also that the viruses could be find elsewhere in the body than in the lungs.

But speaking of human seasonal flu's and the few pandemic at least after the 1918, all the times they must have included the respiratory component, so it must be respiratory(?)

To a human flu virus to not be respiratory, it must be changed in a way that it could not transmit itself by respiratory ways (?).

So, maybe here is only an read/write glitch,
actualy your text want's to point to the fact that this novel virus have upgraded into itself both the ways of transmission because of the receptors: respiratory and not respiratory, so both primary human (droplets/respiratory) and primary avian (shedding intestinal viruses) in one?


Quote:
Originally Posted by AlaskaDenise View Post
It depends on the predominant binding receptors. a2,3 tend to bind to the intestines and lower lungs, while a2,6 tends to bind to upper respiratory.

In http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16022777...

Influenza A H5N1 replication sites in humans.



Perhaps, (in my non-expert opinion) it is because H5N1 is still more avian, which has more a2,3 receptors.

However, various influenzas can contain a fair number of a2,3 receptors which yield intestinal symptoms.

.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old May 2nd, 2009, 02:20 PM
Forelle Forelle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 10
Lightbulb Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

The first 7 cases are from Tlalpan and Magdalena Contreras, as far as I know.

Tlalpan is here:

and Magdalena Contreras is here:

They are next to one another.

Here is some more information on Wikipedia:
Tlalpan
Magdalena Contreras
Quote:
Por la delegación corre el último rio vivo del Distrito Federal, el Río Magdalena, que sufre un grave problema de contaminación.
I don't know where the other (so far) 9 cases are from.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old May 2nd, 2009, 10:30 PM
Forelle Forelle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 10
Lightbulb Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

Actually, there are 19 death cases so far. Here is a table with the locations:
http://www.prevencioninfluenza.gob.mx/
Unfortunately, it just mentions Mexico City (= Distrito Federal) and not its delegaciones.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old May 10th, 2009, 09:39 AM
Forelle Forelle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 10
Lightbulb Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

I think the question is rather answered, as this article (and others plus the Mexican conference with the Health Minister) show:
http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...S.db58678.html
Quote:
"This unfortunate death is consistent with the two other confirmed H1N1 deaths in Texas, where both suffered underlying health issues," said Dr. Goldbaum in a press release. "This death reminds us that influenza can be a very serious illness, especially if a person has underlying health problems."
Whenever more information on the confirmed deaths in Mexico was released, it was said that those people suffered underlying health issues, too (I already mentioned a few here in this forum).
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old May 10th, 2009, 10:23 AM
HenryN HenryN is offline
Retired
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 20,294
Default Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

INFLUENZA A (H1N1) - WORLDWIDE (17)
***********************************
A ProMED-mail post
<http://www.promedmail.org>
ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases
<http://www.isid.org>

Date: Fri 8 May 2009
From: Marcel Jonges
<Marcel.Jonges@RIVM.NL>


Travel-associated influenza A (H1N1) with a virus containing a mutation in PB2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Netherlands, the 2nd laboratory confirmed human case of
influenza A (H1N1) virus infection was reported on 7 May 2009. A
53-year-old woman returned on the 30 Apr 2009 from Cancun, Mexico.
During the flight she developed an unproductive cough. Then, 2 days
later on 2 May 2009, she had a temperature of 38.6C and a sore throat
and consulted a general practitioner. Samples were submitted for
diagnostic evaluation and both the patient and her husband were
treated with oseltamivir. The patient recovered completely and
uneventfully, and samples collected 4 days later tested negative. The
virus was analyzed for presence of antiviral resistance markers in
the neuraminidase and for human adaptation markers in the PB2 protein
by direct sequencing.

The sequence data suggested that the virus was susceptible to both
oseltamivir and zanamivir. The amino acid 627 in PB2 (glutamicacid)
was not human-host-adapted, similar to recent swine influenza A
(H1N1) viruses. However, a glutamic acid to glycine amino acid
substitution was detected at position 677 in PB2. This mutation was
not observed in any of the A (H1N1) sequences submitted since 27 Apr
2009. Lam et al. (2008) postulated that this substitution could
reflect adaptation to mammalian hosts of highly pathogenic avian
influenza A (H5N1) viruses (1), as it was found to be under positive
selection based on phylogenetics of Indonesian viruses. Based on the
position of the mutation it might contribute to more efficient
human-to-human transmission by enhanced replicative efficiency of the
polymerase of the influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans [PB2 is a
polymerase component. - Mod.CP]. Experiments are underway to test the
relevance of this finding.

Reference:
----------
(1) Lam TT, Hon CC, Pybus OG, Kosakovsky Pond SL, Wong RT, Yip CW,
Zeng F, Leung FC, Evolutionary and transmission dynamics of
reassortant H5N1 influenza virus in Indonesia, PLoS Pathog. 2008 Aug
22;4(8):e1000130.

[Byline: Marcel Jonges, Adam Meijer, Pieter Overduin, Titia Kortbeek,
Rob van Kessel, Paul Bijkerk, Martin Schutten, Theo Bestebroer,
Charles Boucher, Guus Rimmelzwaan, Ron Fouchier, Ab Osterhaus, and
Marion Koopmans
At the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment,
Bilthoven, the Netherlands, and the Erasmus Medical Center,
Rotterdam, the Netherlands]

--
Marcel.Jonges
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
Centre for Infectious Disease Control
P.O. Box 1
3720 BA, Bilthoven
The Netherlands
<Marcel.Jonges@RIVM.NL>

[The identification of a single mutation in the PB2 gene (encoding
the major component of the viral polymerase) of this Netherlands
isolate of the novel 2009 strain of influenza A (H1N1) virus is an
interesting finding only previously reported in the case of avian
influenza A (H5N1) virus. It is conceivable that such a mutation
might influence the transmissibility and the host range of the virus.
However, it would be premature to draw such a conclusion since there
appears to have been no onward transmission of the virus to any other
person. Nonetheless this is clearly a site which should be kept under
surveillance in future studies. - Mod.CP]

[The Netherlands can be located on the HealthMap/ProMED-mail
interactive map at:
<http://healthmap.org/r/00by>
-CopyEd.EJP]

[see also:
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (16): case counts 20090507.1715
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (15) 20090507.1709
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (14): case counts 20090507.1702
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (13) 20090506.1695
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (12): case counts 20090505.1681
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (11): coincident H3N2 variation 20090505.1679
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (10): case counts 20090504.1675
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (09) 20090504.1673
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (08): case counts 20090503.1660
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (07) 20090503.1658
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (06): case counts 20090502.1654
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (05) 20090503.1657
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (04): case counts 20090501.1648
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (03) 20090501.1646
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide (02): case counts 20090430.1638
Influenza A (H1N1) - worldwide 20090430.1636]
....................cp/ejp/dk
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old May 10th, 2009, 10:25 AM
HenryN HenryN is offline
Retired
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 20,294
Default Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by niman View Post
INFLUENZA A (H1N1) - WORLDWIDE (17)
***********************************
A ProMED-mail post
<http://www.promedmail.org>
ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases
<http://www.isid.org>

Date: Fri 8 May 2009
From: Marcel Jonges
<Marcel.Jonges@RIVM.NL>


Travel-associated influenza A (H1N1) with a virus containing a mutation in PB2
"Travel-associated influenza A (H1N1)" is pure propaganda (in HEADLINE). Promed continues to embarass scientific community with nonsense posts.
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old May 10th, 2009, 10:52 AM
Siegfried X Siegfried X is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 129
Default Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

This is from CIDRAP, May 8:

Quote:
WHO experts held a conference call yesterday with Mexican officials to discuss clinical findings in the patients who died from severe swine flu infections, Sylvie Briand, acting director of the WHO's Global Influenza Program, said today at a media briefing. Mexican health officials have identified two high-risk groups: previously healthy young people who deteriorated rapidly with acute pneumonia and people with chronic health conditions such as cardiovascular disease or tuberculosis. Briand said viral pneumonia has played a role in the deaths, but bacterial pneumonia has been less of a factor, unlike in other pandemics. Authorities have found that causes of death are typically respiratory failure or organ failure.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old May 10th, 2009, 12:17 PM
AlexanderSJones AlexanderSJones is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 87
Default Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

One of the Mexican isolates had two SNPs in PB2 , not seen in any other isolates...



There is evidence that the Mexican swine flu strain is NOT the same as the North American strain -- contrary to the pronouncement of Dr. Frank Plummer at the Canadian National Laboratory of Microbiology -- who held a press conference yesterday...


Regarding the genetic analysis of Mexican Swine Flu vs. Canadian Swine Flu -- There are SNPs on PA and PB2 , which are ONLY present in the Mexican strain -- a sequence released by Dr. Plummer's own laboratory! The fact that this difference was in his own data should bring into question the credibility of government health labs' ability and will to protect the public interest..


Suppose we use New York / Canada as the consensus strain. There are two unique polymorphisms found ONLY in Mexico (so far, anyway):



L275I on PA
N82S on PB2




Last edited by sharon sanders; May 10th, 2009 at 10:18 PM. Reason: edited out bash
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old May 10th, 2009, 12:42 PM
nomadic wench nomadic wench is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 145
Default Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

Quote:
One of the Mexican isolates had two SNPs in PB2 , not seen in any other isolates...
That's interesting. In plain English does that mean just one patient?

Were other Mexican isolates the same as the N.American ones?
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old May 10th, 2009, 05:38 PM
AlexanderSJones AlexanderSJones is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 87
Default Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

Yes, at least one isolate (patient) had this -- A/Mexico/InDRE4487/2009(H1N1). But curiously, this particular published sequence had no information on the patient, age, location, etc. The two SNPs on this strain are different from all other sequences around the world, and occur on the PA gene and the PB2 gene.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old May 10th, 2009, 07:07 PM
English Teacher English Teacher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 94
Default Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

This is really interesting, but what does it MEAN, Alexander?
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old May 11th, 2009, 01:17 AM
gsgs's Avatar
gsgs gsgs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: germany
Posts: 8,620
Default Re: Swine flu worse in Mexico than US, but why?

the mutations are not in another published Mexican virus
nor in a close Arizona virus.
So it's presumably just a variation which didn't spread
__________________
I'm interested in expert panflu damage estimates
my current links: http://bit.ly/hFI7H ILI-charts: http://bit.ly/CcRgT
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Disclaimer:

The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our staff to manually review each post.

The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original authors or posters and are not endorsed by, or representative of the opinions of, the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author or poster and should not be construed as statements of advice or factual information.

Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. NO posts on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. FluTrackers.com Inc. reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, FluTrackers.com Inc. disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.

This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall FluTrackers.com Inc. be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.

Finally, FluTrackers.com Inc. reserves the right to delete, correct, or make changes to any post on this website without notice at any time for any reason.

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to public health, civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article. Please remember you are responsible for what you post on the internet and you could be sued by the original copyright holder if you do not honor these rules.

If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright

we may be contacted concerning copyright matters at:

FluTrackers.com Inc.
c/o Sharon Sanders
1676 Hibiscus Avenue
Winter Park, Florida 32789
Phone: 407-406-3037
E-Mail: flutrackers@earthlink.net

In accordance with section 512 of the U.S. Copyright Act our contact information has been registered with the United States Copyright Office. "Safe Harbor" noticing procedures as outlined in the DMCA apply to this website concerning all 3rd party posts published herein.

If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question.

All 3rd party material posted on this website is the copyright of the respective owners / authors. FluTrackers.com Inc. makes no claim of copyright on such material.

For more information please visit: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.

FluTrackers Does Not Provide Any Medical Advice:

FluTrackers, Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster.

The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website.

By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.

By using and/or accessing this site, either passively or actively, you are agreeing to all of the above conditions. Also, by using and/or accessing this site, either passively or actively, you agree to conduct all business and legal affairs related to this website in the jurisdiction of Flutrackers.com Inc. which is registered in Central Florida, USA.

These Disclaimers are subject to change at anytime.

Email the Webmaster with questions or comments about this site at flutrackers@earthlink.net


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 PM.