 |

November 2nd, 2006, 03:34 AM
|
 |
Editor, Senior Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,703
|
|
China's bird flu response slammed
http://calsun.canoe.ca/News/World/20...f-2208077.html
November 2, 2006
By CP
The World Health Organization aimed a broadside at the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture yesterday.
The WHO blasted the ministry for not alerting the global community about a new variant of the worrisome H5N1 avian flu virus.
The health group also took aim at the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture for hoarding virus samples and for not doing enough to contain the spread of H5N1 in poultry.
The WHO's top representative for China also suggested the ministry may be selectively reporting findings of H5N1 in poultry, only advising international authorities of large outbreaks.
"What we sense from the Ministry of Agriculture ... is that they are reporting the major outbreaks," Dr. Henk Bekedam said.
"They might not report if they find here and there a virus."
Under international rules, countries are required to report any discovery of a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus such as H5N1 to the World Organization for Animal Health -- known as the OIE.
.
__________________
"The next major advancement in the health of American people will be determined by what the individual is willing to do for himself"-- John Knowles, Former President of the Rockefeller Foundation
|

November 2nd, 2006, 03:45 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 86
|
|
Re: China's bird flu response slammed
By all means press China as hard as we can but be aware that China will do what it has always done..precisely as it will.Why? ...because it can. It is too big to bother. China is big...we have to be smarter. Whoo...
|

November 2nd, 2006, 03:55 AM
|
 |
Editor, Senior Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,703
|
|
Re: China's bird flu response slammed
China is not the only country that fits that characterization.
The US, Canada, and some European nations are not 100% transparent on this issue.
China has recently made an almost complete reversal of its prior position, which is to be commended.
.
__________________
"The next major advancement in the health of American people will be determined by what the individual is willing to do for himself"-- John Knowles, Former President of the Rockefeller Foundation
|

November 2nd, 2006, 04:41 AM
|
|
Retired
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 20,294
|
|
Re: China's bird flu response slammed
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AlaskaDenise
China is not the only country that fits that characterization.
The US, Canada, and some European nations are not 100% transparent on this issue.
China has recently made an almost complete reversal of its prior position, which is to be commended.
.
|
Yes, China's pandemic preparedness plan dated Jan 6, 2006 had up to date data which clearly showed that the Fujian strain was spreading
http://www.recombinomics.com/phylo/H..._MOH_2006.html
http://www.recombinomics.com/News/04...ead_China.html
and the FAO report on outbreaks in 2005 cited use of SEVERAL vaccines, which was a STRONG signal that the old vaccines were not working
http://www.recombinomics.com/News/11...ng_Spread.html
|

November 2nd, 2006, 05:13 AM
|
 |
Retired
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South of the North Pole
Posts: 12,055
|
|
Re: China's bird flu response slammed
Thank you for this historical perspective Dr Niman.
__________________
LIN YUTANG:
Hope is like a road in the country;
there was never a road,
but when many people walk on it,
the road comes into existence.
|

November 2nd, 2006, 06:02 AM
|
 |
Editor, Senior Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 10,613
|
|
Re: China's bird flu response slammed
China says no evidence of new bird flu strain
02 Nov 2006 10:23:35 GMT
BEIJING, Nov 2 (Reuters) - China has found no evidence of a new strain of H5N1 bird flu in its southern provinces and said on Thursday there was no need to share virus samples with the World Health Organisation (WHO).
Scientists in Hong Kong and the United States said in a report released this week they had detected a new strain of bird flu, first isolated in the southern Chinese province of Fujian last year, that may have started outbreaks in Southeast Asia.
But China rejected the report, published in the U.S.-based Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (www.pnas.org), saying there was no evidence of major changes to the virus since 2004.
"Up to now, the bird flu viruses selected from the south share a high uniformity," Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao told a regular news conference.
"There has no marked change in the biological characteristics of the organisms."
China, home to the world's biggest poultry population, has been at the centre of the fight against bird flu, which scientists fear could mutate into a form that can pass easily between people, potentially leading to a pandemic.
It has battled dozens of outbreaks in birds, and seen at least 21 human cases, including 14 deaths.
But the World Health Organisation says its understanding of the virus and how it might be changing is being hampered by the fact China has not shared animal virus samples since 2004.
"It's our understanding that there have been certainly changes in the virus and continual evolution in the virus since 2004 and the viruses that we requested from 2005 have still not been shared with WHO," said Julie Hall, the WHO's bird flu coordinator in Beijing.
The point was not whether there were major differences in virus strains, she said: it was about being able to keep abreast of changes, however minute, to better understand how the virus is developing.
"Whether it be dramatic or significant, it's about that regular understanding so that we can see that we're keeping on top of this," Hall said.
China was criticised for its initial cover-up of the SARS virus, which first emerged in its southern province of Guangdong in 2003, but the government has defended its handling of bird flu, saying it has been promptly reporting outbreaks.
Liu said China was maintaining "close cooperative relations" with the WHO and the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organisation in dealing with H5N1.
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/PEK282865.htm
|

November 2nd, 2006, 07:52 AM
|
|
Retired
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 20,294
|
|
Re: China's bird flu response slammed
|

November 2nd, 2006, 06:04 PM
|
 |
Senior Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,585
|
|
Re: China's bird flu response slammed
China rebukes US report on bird flu strain
(Xinhua)
Updated: 2006-11-02 22:22 China's Foreign Ministry on Thursday rejected a report by the U.S.-based National Academy of Sciences that a new strain of H5N1 bird flu has been found in the south of the country.
"The continuous surveillance since 2004 has found no evidence of major mutations to the virus and the biological characteristics of the bird flu viruses selected from the south share a high uniformity," Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao said.
A report about a new strain of H5N1 bird flu in southern China was released in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences this week, saying it was found in almost all poultry outbreaks and some human cases.
Liu said the findings of mutations to the virus in the northern China have been reported to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE).
"China has cooperated closely with the WHO and the FAO and shares all information on bird flu and the virus with the international community," said Liu.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2...ent_723290.htm
|

November 2nd, 2006, 07:29 PM
|
|
|
Re: China's bird flu response slammed
Are Liu's remarks the final, minor, otherwise inconsequential straw that will break the flu camel's back?
What is the definition of a major mutation?
What is the definition of a minor mutation?
What is the definition of a mutation?
How many minor mutations equal or come close to equalling a major mutation?
Without these facts, Liu's statement is uninterpretable.
|

November 2nd, 2006, 09:19 PM
|
|
Retired
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 20,294
|
|
Re: China's bird flu response slammed
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GaudiaRay
Are Liu's remarks the final, minor, otherwise inconsequential straw that will break the flu camel's back?
What is the definition of a major mutation?
What is the definition of a minor mutation?
What is the definition of a mutation?
How many minor mutations equal or come close to equalling a major mutation?
Without these facts, Liu's statement is uninterpretable.
|
Major mutation equals reassortent equals fairy tales.
This is the WHO cruel hoax being replayed to them. All countries (China, Indonesia, Thailand, etc) cite this fairy tale to reassure.
It comes right out of WHO's play book (aka situation updates).
|

November 2nd, 2006, 09:22 PM
|
|
Retired
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 20,294
|
|
Re: China's bird flu response slammed
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GaudiaRay
Are Liu's remarks the final, minor, otherwise inconsequential straw that will break the flu camel's back?
What is the definition of a major mutation?
What is the definition of a minor mutation?
What is the definition of a mutation?
How many minor mutations equal or come close to equalling a major mutation?
Without these facts, Liu's statement is uninterpretable.
|
From WHO's situation update on first human cases in Indonesia
http://www.who.int/csr/don/2005_07_29c/en/index.html
"Genotyping of the PCR-amplified isolate from the confirmed case shows high homogeneity with other H5N1 isolates from poultry in Java, and no evidence of reassortment."
|

November 2nd, 2006, 09:33 PM
|
|
Retired
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 20,294
|
|
Re: China's bird flu response slammed
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GaudiaRay
Are Liu's remarks the final, minor, otherwise inconsequential straw that will break the flu camel's back?
What is the definition of a major mutation?
What is the definition of a minor mutation?
What is the definition of a mutation?
How many minor mutations equal or come close to equalling a major mutation?
Without these facts, Liu's statement is uninterpretable.
|
WHO update on first cluster in Vietnam
"Virus genetic materials from two fatal cases in this cluster – sisters aged 23 and 30 years – have now been fully sequenced by the Government Virus Unit of Hong Kong’s Department of Health. Both viruses are of avian origin and contain no human influenza genes."
http://www.who.int/csr/don/2004_02_06/en/index.html
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
Disclaimer:
The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our staff to manually review each post.
The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original authors or posters and are not endorsed by, or representative of the opinions of, the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author or poster and should not be construed as statements of advice or factual information.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. NO posts on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. FluTrackers.com Inc. reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, FluTrackers.com Inc. disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall FluTrackers.com Inc. be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Finally, FluTrackers.com Inc. reserves the right to delete, correct, or make changes to any post on this website without notice at any time for any reason.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to public health, civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article. Please remember you are responsible for what you post on the internet and you could be sued by the original copyright holder if you do not honor these rules.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright
we may be contacted concerning copyright matters at:
FluTrackers.com Inc.
c/o Sharon Sanders
1676 Hibiscus Avenue
Winter Park, Florida 32789
Phone: 407-406-3037
E-Mail: flutrackers@earthlink.net
In accordance with section 512 of the U.S. Copyright Act our contact information has been registered with the United States Copyright Office. "Safe Harbor" noticing procedures as outlined in the DMCA apply to this website concerning all 3rd party posts published herein.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is the copyright of the respective owners / authors. FluTrackers.com Inc. makes no claim of copyright on such material.
For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
FluTrackers Does Not Provide Any Medical Advice:
FluTrackers, Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster.
The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website.
By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
By using and/or accessing this site, either passively or actively, you are agreeing to all of the above conditions. Also, by using and/or accessing this site, either passively or actively, you agree to conduct all business and legal affairs related to this website in the jurisdiction of Flutrackers.com Inc. which is registered in Central Florida, USA.
These Disclaimers are subject to change at anytime.
Email the Webmaster with questions or comments about this site at flutrackers@earthlink.net
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 PM.
|