• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Acceptability of seasonal influenza vaccines among health care workers in Vietnam in 2017

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2020 Jan 27. pii: S0264-410X(19)31699-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.047. [Epub ahead of print] [h=1]Acceptability of seasonal influenza vaccines among health care workers in Vietnam in 2017.[/h]
Nguyen TTM[SUP]1[/SUP], Lafond KE[SUP]2[/SUP], Nguyen TX[SUP]3[/SUP], Tran PD[SUP]3[/SUP], Nguyen HM[SUP]3[/SUP], Ha VTC[SUP]3[/SUP], Do TT[SUP]3[/SUP], Ha NT[SUP]4[/SUP], Seward JF[SUP]5[/SUP], McFarland JW[SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]INTRODUCTION:[/h] A demonstration project in Vietnam provided 11,000 doses of human seasonal influenza vaccine free of charge to healthcare workers (HCWs) in 4 provinces of Vietnam. Through this project, we conducted an acceptability survey to identify the main reasons that individuals chose to be vaccinated or not to inform and improve future immunization activities.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional survey from May to August 2017 among HCWs at 13 selected health facilities. We employed logistic regression to determine the association between demographic and professional factors, and the decision to receive seasonal influenza vaccine. We performed post-hoc pairwise comparisons among reasons for and against vaccination using Chi square and Fisher's exact tests (for cell sizes <5).
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] A total of 1,450 HCWs participated in the survey, with a higher proportion of females than males (74% versus 26%). The median age of the participating HCWs was 35 years (median range 25.8-44.2). Among those surveyed, 700 (48%) HCWs were vaccinated against seasonal influenza during the first half of 2017. Younger HCWs under 30 and 30-39 years old were less likely to get vaccinated against seasonal influenza than HCWs ≥50 years old (OR = 0.5; 95%CI 0.4-0.8 and OR = 0.6; 95%CI 0.4-0.8 respectively). Nurses and other employees were more likely to get seasonal influenza vaccination than physicians (OR = 1.5; 95%CI 1.0-2.4 and OR = 2.0; 95%CI 1.2-3.2 respectively). The most common reason for accepting vaccination was fear of getting influenza (66%) and the most common reason for not getting vaccinated was concern about vaccine side effects (23%).
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] Acceptability of seasonal influenza vaccines in this setting varied among HCWs by age group and job category. Interventions to increase acceptance of vaccine among HCWs in this setting where influenza vaccine is being introduced free for the first time should include targeted risk communication on vaccine safety and efficacy.
Published by Elsevier Ltd.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Acceptability; Health care workers; Influenza vaccination

PMID: 32001072 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.047
 
Back
Top Bottom