tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Apr 24.
doi: 10.7326/M20-1738. Online ahead of print.
Ventilator Triage Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic at U.S. Hospitals Associated With Members of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors
Armand H Matheny Antommaria[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tyler S Gibb[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Amy L McGuire[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Paul Root Wolpe[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Matthew K Wynia[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Megan K Applewhite[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Arthur Caplan[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Douglas S Diekema[SUP] 8 [/SUP], D Micah Hester[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Lisa Soleymani Lehmann[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Renee McLeod-Sordjan[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Tamar Schiff[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Holly K Tabor[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Sarah E Wieten[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Jason T Eberl[SUP] 13 [/SUP], and for a Task Force of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has or threatens to overwhelm health care systems. Many institutions are developing ventilator triage policies.
Objective: To characterize the development of ventilator triage policies and compare policy content.
Design: Survey and mixed-methods content analysis.
Setting: North American hospitals associated with members of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors.
Participants: Program directors.
Measurements: Characteristics of institutions and policies, including triage criteria and triage committee membership.
Results: Sixty-seven program directors responded (response rate, 91.8%); 36 (53.7%) hospitals did not yet have a policy, and 7 (10.4%) hospitals' policies could not be shared. The 29 institutions providing policies were relatively evenly distributed among the 4 U.S. geographic regions (range, 5 to 9 policies per region). Among the 26 unique policies analyzed, 3 (11.3%) were produced by state health departments. The most frequently cited triage criteria were benefit (25 policies [96.2%]), need (14 [53.8%]), age (13 [50.0%]), conservation of resources (10 [38.5%]), and lottery (9 [34.6%]). Twenty-one (80.8%) policies use scoring systems, and 20 of these (95.2%) use a version of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Among the policies that specify the triage team's composition (23 [88.5%]), all require or recommend a physician member, 20 (87.0%) a nurse, 16 (69.6%) an ethicist, 8 (34.8%) a chaplain, and 8 (34.8%) a respiratory therapist. Thirteen (50.0% of all policies) require or recommend those making triage decisions not be involved in direct patient care, but only 2 (7.7%) require that their decisions be blinded to ethically irrelevant considerations.
Limitation: The results may not be generalizable to institutions without academic bioethics programs.
Conclusion: Over one half of respondents did not have ventilator triage policies. Policies have substantial heterogeneity, and many omit guidance on fair implementation.
doi: 10.7326/M20-1738. Online ahead of print.
Ventilator Triage Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic at U.S. Hospitals Associated With Members of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors
Armand H Matheny Antommaria[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tyler S Gibb[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Amy L McGuire[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Paul Root Wolpe[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Matthew K Wynia[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Megan K Applewhite[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Arthur Caplan[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Douglas S Diekema[SUP] 8 [/SUP], D Micah Hester[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Lisa Soleymani Lehmann[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Renee McLeod-Sordjan[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Tamar Schiff[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Holly K Tabor[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Sarah E Wieten[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Jason T Eberl[SUP] 13 [/SUP], and for a Task Force of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors
Affiliations
- PMID: 32330224
- DOI: 10.7326/M20-1738
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has or threatens to overwhelm health care systems. Many institutions are developing ventilator triage policies.
Objective: To characterize the development of ventilator triage policies and compare policy content.
Design: Survey and mixed-methods content analysis.
Setting: North American hospitals associated with members of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors.
Participants: Program directors.
Measurements: Characteristics of institutions and policies, including triage criteria and triage committee membership.
Results: Sixty-seven program directors responded (response rate, 91.8%); 36 (53.7%) hospitals did not yet have a policy, and 7 (10.4%) hospitals' policies could not be shared. The 29 institutions providing policies were relatively evenly distributed among the 4 U.S. geographic regions (range, 5 to 9 policies per region). Among the 26 unique policies analyzed, 3 (11.3%) were produced by state health departments. The most frequently cited triage criteria were benefit (25 policies [96.2%]), need (14 [53.8%]), age (13 [50.0%]), conservation of resources (10 [38.5%]), and lottery (9 [34.6%]). Twenty-one (80.8%) policies use scoring systems, and 20 of these (95.2%) use a version of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Among the policies that specify the triage team's composition (23 [88.5%]), all require or recommend a physician member, 20 (87.0%) a nurse, 16 (69.6%) an ethicist, 8 (34.8%) a chaplain, and 8 (34.8%) a respiratory therapist. Thirteen (50.0% of all policies) require or recommend those making triage decisions not be involved in direct patient care, but only 2 (7.7%) require that their decisions be blinded to ethically irrelevant considerations.
Limitation: The results may not be generalizable to institutions without academic bioethics programs.
Conclusion: Over one half of respondents did not have ventilator triage policies. Policies have substantial heterogeneity, and many omit guidance on fair implementation.