• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Banking Woes

kent nickell

Well-known member
There is a good video interview of Meredith Whitney here. She seems to be one of the most realistic and accurate analysts of the economy and particularly the banking industry. ie on Citigroup reporting positive earnings over the last few months 'yes they are positive pre-expenses' Hello. She sees further credit tightening taking a toll on banks. Good borrowers don't want to borrow in this environment and lenders don't want to lend to bad borrowers. (a new twist). Unemployment will also have a large effect on state and city municipal bonds...

http://www.cnbc.com/id/29735000

Whitney: Banking Woes Likely to Get Worse in 2009
By: Jeff Cox, CNBC.com | 17 Mar 2009 |

A surge in borrower defaults and unemployment pressures will make 2009 an even uglier year for banks than last year, analyst Meredith Whitney said.She predicted "breakups and M&As on a grand scale" as the industry seeks to remake itself in the face of all its capital pressures.

"I don't think this year is going to look any better than last year," Whitney said in an interview Tuesday on CNBC. "In fact it will look worse because there's so much credit coming out of the system."

Whitney, a former analyst at Oppenheimer who recently opened her own firm, is renowned for calling out the problems with banks' toxic assets before the issue became widespread.As some have been predicting the worst may be over for the banking sector, Whitney countered that many of the statements about some of the big banks showing profits ignore the burden that additional writedowns will pose through the year. In particular, she said Citigroup's statement that it had turned a profit the first two months of 2009 might came back to haunt it once a fuller picture was presented.

Consumers also will face pressure as unemployment grows and banks and credit card companies start calling in credit lines to avoid getting stuck with even more bad debt.

"The probability of more people going into default is higher, so the banks are going to have a tough time," she said.

As a solution to some of the banking system's woes, Whitney said the government should focus less on ever-changing rescue plans and instead start helping smaller institutions ramp up their community lending to local businesses and homeowners.

"You can re-energize the local lending scene and then supercharge those banks," she said. "You supercharge those so they're able to gain critical mass and start getting loans on a super-regional basis to businesses, to homeowners that qualify. At least that mitigates some of the capital that's surely going to come out of the market."

The financial sector has been under pressure since the onset of the credit crisis last fall. But recently major banks like Citigroup [C 2.51 0.18 (+7.73%) ] , JPMorgan Chase [JPM 25.14 2.05 (+8.88%) ] and Bank of America [BAC 6.27 0.09 (+1.46%) ] , have said early results are showing signs of hope.

Whitney predicted that some of the largest institutions will be remade this year in a way not seen before. Those mergers and acquisitions will see companies come together to create unique syynergies--she used a blending of Citi and American Express [AXP 12.92 0.26 (+2.05%) ] as a hypothetical case where one business' strength could compensate for another's weakness.

"You're going to have some growth vehicles that come out of it but they're not going to look anything like today's version of these gobbledygook banks," she said.

In addition to the natural activity that will take place, Whitney said banks also will need help from Washginton. She urged policy makers above all to be consistent.

"Any game that you want to plan as a corporation, the rules are changing all the time," she said. "You can't function as a business operator if the rules are changing."

Displaying leadership and managing expectations will be the key.

"They need to show leadership by saying, 'OK, what's the world going to look like in five years?' and look backwards from that," Whitney said. "In five years you know that the big banks are going to have a lot less control and power than they have now. We have to disaggregate, dislodge that market share dominated by five main players."

"Let's invigorate and supercharge some of the smaller players to get them to a medium-enough size so they can start making loans and they can start moving the needle."

And she called on government leaders to harness the American spirit to rebuild the economy, similar to the way so many people come together to wear the color of the Irish on St. Patrick's Day.

"There's a spirit that can't be dislodged by the economic turmoil," she said. "Now is a great opportunity to capture that spirit as opposed to set expectations too high which is what (Treasury Secretary Timothy) Geithner did with the original plan and then just disappoint. People will give you the benefit of the doubt until you keep disappointing them."
 
Re: Banking Woes

The one area where I would disagree with her analysis is that she appears to be against aggressive home mortgage modifications and apparently against not letting AIG execs get their bonuses. She has fair claims that these types of contract modifications after the fact create moral hazard for our system of laws and create further uncertainty in the markets if people assume that contracts may not be honored.

But I would also argue that if you have a situation where billions of dollars of taxpayer money are being funneled though AIG to pay off hedge funds that placed bets that the housing market would crumble, execs of many companies are walking off with multimillion dollar bonuses while their shareholders are wiped out and the bondholders are bailed out and that the underlying problem was ripe with predatory lending compounded by predatory securitizations that there may be a place for unconventional methods to try and right some of these problems....
 
Re: Banking Woes

I think the problem with aggressive involuntary home mortgage modifications is that who is going to lend on homes then? What incentive is there to lend? Lenders willing to lend in that environment will charge more (interest) to make those loans.

I think a simple mortgage insurance program offered by the U.S. government for people to re-finance if they have income is workable. They can borrow up to 130% of the current appraisal. Credit scores can be less if they have verified income. This gets people out of the adjustable interest rate mortgages and gives the real estate market some time to stabilize.

Also - I think loans insured by this program should be "assume, no qualify". This means for the life of the loan on a particular home, people can assume the loan without qualifying. This is very appealing to immigrants, investors, first home buyers, young people, etc.
 
Re: Banking Woes

I'm reading about $4T being spent now (and someone said
$10T were neede...)

while about $10B were spent on panflu the last years


so ...
can't we just get another -say- $20B to fix the panflu problem ?

just 0.5% of the 4T
 
Re: Banking Woes

Meredith Whitney from this interview a few weeks ago ""In particular, she said Citigroup's statement that it had turned a profit the first two months of 2009 might come back to haunt it once a fuller picture was presented.""

It looks like a lot of the bank 'profitability' over the last few months which drove up their stocks may have been due to taxpayer money being filtered to them through AIG...

A very slippery slope....

hattip ccjach

http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/03/exclusive-aig-was-responsible-for-banks.html
 
Back
Top Bottom