• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMJ: Evaluating the importance of policy amenable factors in explaining influenza vaccination: a cross-sectional multinational study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):e014668. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014668.
[h=1]Evaluating the importance of policy amenable factors in explaining influenza vaccination: a cross-sectional multinational study.[/h] Wheelock A[SUP]1[/SUP], Miraldo M[SUP]2[/SUP], Thomson A[SUP]3[/SUP], Vincent C[SUP]4[/SUP], Sevdalis N[SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] Despite continuous efforts to improve influenza vaccination coverage, uptake among high-risk groups remains suboptimal. We aimed to identify policy amenable factors associated with vaccination and to measure their importance in order to assist in the monitoring of vaccination sentiment and the design of communication strategies and interventions to improve vaccination rates.
[h=4]SETTING:[/h] The USA, the UK and France.
[h=4]PARTICIPANTS:[/h] A total of 2412 participants were surveyed across the three countries.
[h=4]OUTCOME MEASURES:[/h] Self-reported influenza vaccination.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Between March and April 2014, a stratified random sampling strategy was employed with the aim of obtaining nationally representative samples in the USA, the UK and France through online databases and random-digit dialling. Participants were asked about vaccination practices, perceptions and feelings. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with past influenza vaccination.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] The models were able to explain 64%-80% of the variance in vaccination behaviour. Overall, sociopsychological variables, which are inherently amenable to policy, were better at explaining past vaccination behaviour than demographic, socioeconomic and health variables. Explanatory variables included social influence (physician), influenza and vaccine risk perceptions and traumatic childhood experiences.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Our results indicate that evidence-based sociopsychological items should be considered for inclusion into national immunisation surveys to gauge the public's views, identify emerging concerns and thus proactively and opportunely address potential barriers and harness vaccination drivers.
? Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Adult; Behaviour; Beliefs; Influenza; Perceptions; Vaccine

PMID: 28706088 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014668
Free full text
 
Back
Top Bottom