• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Cellular Immune Responses of Older Adults to Four Influenza Vaccines: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Comparison

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Jun 21:0. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1337615. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Cellular Immune Responses of Older Adults to Four Influenza Vaccines: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Comparison.[/h] Kumar A[SUP]1[/SUP], McElhaney JE[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Walrond L[SUP]5[/SUP], Cyr TD[SUP]5[/SUP], Merani S[SUP]1[/SUP], Kollmann TR[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]6[/SUP], Halperin SA[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]7[/SUP], Scheifele DW[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]6[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Cellular immunity is important for protection against the serious complications of influenza in older adults. As it is unclear if newer influenza vaccines elicit greater cellular responses than standard vaccines, we compared responses to two standard and two newer licensed trivalent inactivated vaccines (TIVs) in a randomized trial in older adults. Non-frail adults ≥65 years old were randomly assigned to receive standard subunit, MF59-adjuvanted subunit, standard split-virus or intradermal split-virus TIV. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) harvested pre- and 3-weeks post-vaccination were stimulated with live A/H3N2 virus. PBMC supernatants were tested for interleukin 10 (IL-10) and interferon gamma (IFN-γ), and lysates for granzyme B (GrB). Flow cytometry identified CD4[SUP]+[/SUP] and CD8[SUP]+[/SUP] T- cells expressing intracellular IL-2, IL-10, IFN-γ, GrB, or perforin. Differences following immunization were assessed for paired subject samples and among vaccines. 120 seniors participated, 29-31 per group, which were well matched demographically. Virus-stimulated PBMCs were GrB-rich before and after vaccination, with minimal increases evident. Immunization did not increase secretion of IFN-γ or IL-10. However, cytolytic effector T-cells (CD8[SUP]+[/SUP]GrB[SUP]+[/SUP]perforin[SUP]+[/SUP]) increased significantly in percentage post-vaccination in all groups, to similar mean values across groups. CD4[SUP]+[/SUP]GrB[SUP]+[/SUP]perforin[SUP]+[/SUP] T-cells also increased significantly after each vaccine, to similar mean values among vaccines. Vaccination did not increase the low baseline percentages of CD4[SUP]+[/SUP] or CD8[SUP]+[/SUP] T-cells expressing IFN-γ, IL-2 or IL-10. In conclusion, participants had pre-existing cellular immunity to H3N2 virus. All four vaccines boosted cellular responses to a similar but limited extent, particularly cytolytic effector CD8[SUP]+[/SUP] T-cells associated with clinical protection against influenza.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] NCT01368796; adults; cellular immunity; immune response; immunization; influenza

PMID: 28635557 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1337615
 
Back
Top Bottom