• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Infect Dis . A Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of Different Prime-Boost Vaccination Schedule

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Infect Dis


. 2024 Mar 27:ciae173.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae173. Online ahead of print. A Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of Different Prime-Boost Vaccination Schedules of 2013 and 2017 A(H7N9) Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccines Administered with and without AS03 Adjuvant in Healthy US Adults

Christina A Rostad[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Robert L Atmar[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Emmanuel B Walter[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Sharon Frey[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Jeffery L Meier[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Amy C Sherman[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Lilin Lai[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Rachel Tsong[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Carol M Kao[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Vanessa Raabe[SUP] 7 9 [/SUP], Hana M El Sahly[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Wendy A Keitel[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jennifer A Whitaker[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Michael J Smith[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Kenneth E Schmader[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Geeta K Swamy[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Getahun Abate[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Patricia Winokur[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Wendy Buchanan[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Kaitlyn Cross[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Ashley Wegel[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Yongxian Xu[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Inci Yildirim[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Satoshi Kamidani[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Nadine Rouphael[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Paul C Roberts[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Mark J Mulligan[SUP] 7 9 [/SUP], Evan J Anderson[SUP] 1 2 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Introduction: A surge of human influenza A(H7N9) cases began in 2016 in China due to an antigenically distinct lineage. Data are needed about the safety and immunogenicity of 2013 and 2017 A(H7N9) inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs) and the effects of AS03 adjuvant, prime-boost interval, and priming effects of 2013 and 2017 A(H7N9) IIVs.
Methods: Healthy adults (n=180), ages 19-50 years, were enrolled into this partially-blinded, randomized, multi-center Phase 2 clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 vaccination groups evaluating homologous versus heterologous prime-boost strategies with two different boost intervals (21 versus 120 days) and two dosages (3.75 or 15 μg of hemagglutinin) administered with or without AS03 adjuvant. Reactogenicity, safety, and immunogenicity measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and neutralizing antibody titers were assessed.
Results: Two doses of A(H7N9) IIV were well tolerated, and no safety issues were identified. Although most participants had injection site and systemic reactogenicity, these symptoms were mostly mild to moderate in severity; injection site reactogenicity was greater in vaccination groups receiving adjuvant. Immune responses were greater after an adjuvanted second dose, and with a longer interval between prime and boost. The highest HAI GMT (95%CI) observed against the 2017 A(H7N9) strain was 133.4 (83.6, 212.6) among participants who received homologous, adjuvanted 3.75 ug+AS03/2017 doses with delayed boost interval.
Conclusions: Administering AS03 adjuvant with the second H7N9 IIV dose and extending the boost interval to 4 months resulted in higher peak antibody responses. These observations can broadly inform strategic approaches for pandemic preparedness. (NCT03589807).

Keywords: 2013 H7N9; 2017 H7N9; Avian Influenza; antibody; boost.

 
Back
Top Bottom