• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Comparing the Cobas Liat Influenza A/B and RSV assay with multiplex nucleic acid testing

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol. 2018 Oct 21. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25344. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Comparing the Cobas Liat Influenza A/B and RSV assay with multiplex nucleic acid testing.[/h] Gosert R[SUP]1[/SUP], Naegele K[SUP]1[/SUP], Hirsch HH[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Influenzavirus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) detection with short turn-around-time (TAT) is pivotal for rapid decisions regarding treatment and infection control. However, negative rapid testing results may come from poor assay sensitivity or from influenza-like illnesses caused by other community-acquired respiratory viruses (CARVs). We prospectively compared the performance of Cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay (LIAT) with our routine multiplexNAT-1 (xTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel, Luminex) and multiplexNAT-2 (ePlex-RPP; GenMark) using 194 consecutive nasopharyngeal swabs from patients with influenza-like illness during winter 2017/18. Discordant results were reanalyzed by specific in-house quantitative NAT. LIAT was positive for Influenza-A, -B, and RSV in 18 (9.3%), 13 (6.7%), and 55 (28.4%) samples, and negative in 108 samples. Other CARVs were detected by multiplexNAT in 66 (34.0%) samples. Concordant results for influenza and RSV were seen in 190 (97.9%), discordant results in 4 (2.1%), which showed low-level RSV (<40000 copies/mL). Sensitivity and specificity of LIAT for Influenza-A, -B, and RSV was 100%, 100% and 100%, and 100%, 99.5% and 100%, respectively. The average TAT of LIAT was 20min compared to 6h and 2h for the multiplexNAT-1 and -2, respectively. Thus, LIAT demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity for influenza and RSV, which together with the simple sample processing and short TAT renders this assay suitable for near-patient testing. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] influenzavirus; nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT); point of care test (POCT); respiratory syncytial virus (RSV); turn-around time (TAT)

PMID: 30345524 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25344
 
Back
Top Bottom