• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Crit Care Explor . Clinical Outcomes With the Use of Prophylactic Versus Therapeutic Anticoagulation in Coronavirus Disease 2019

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Crit Care Explor


. 2020 Dec 16;2(12):e0309.
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000309. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Clinical Outcomes With the Use of Prophylactic Versus Therapeutic Anticoagulation in Coronavirus Disease 2019


Jishu Kaul Motta[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rahila O Ogunnaike[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rutvik Shah[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stephanie Stroever[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Harold V Cede?o[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shyam K Thapa[SUP] 1 [/SUP], John J Chronakos[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Eric J Jimenez[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Joann Petrini[SUP] 2 6 [/SUP], Abhijith Hegde[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the impact of anticoagulation on inhospital mortality among coronavirus disease 2019-positive patients with the a priori hypothesis that there would be a lower risk of inhospital mortality with use of preemptive therapeutic over prophylactic dose enoxaparin or heparin.
Design setting: Retrospective cohort study from April 1, 2020, to April 25, 2020. The date of final follow-up was June 12, 2020 Two large, acute-care hospitals in Western Connecticut.
Patients: Five hundred and one inpatients were identified after discharge as 18 years or older and positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The final sample size included 374 patients after applying exclusion criteria. Demographic variables were collected via hospital billing inquiries, whereas the clinical variables were abstracted from patients' medical records.
Exposure: Preemptive enoxaparin or heparin at a therapeutic or prophylactic dose.
Main results: When comparing treatments through multivariable analysis, risk of inhospital mortality was 2.3 times greater in patients receiving preemptive therapeutic anticoagulation (95% CI = 1.0-4.9; p = 0.04). Additionally, the average treatment effects were higher (β = 0.11, p = 0.01) in the therapeutic group.
Conclusions: An increase in inhospital mortality was observed among patients on preemptive therapeutic anticoagulation. Thus, in the management of coronavirus disease 2019 and its complications, we recommend further research and cautious use of preemptive therapeutic over prophylactic anticoagulation.

Keywords: anticoagulants; coronavirus; length of stay; mortality; pneumonia; thrombosis.
 
Back
Top Bottom