• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Crit Care Explor . One-Year Outcomes of Postintensive Care Syndrome in Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients: A Single Institutional Stud

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Crit Care Explor


. 2021 Dec 2;3(12):e0595.
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000595. eCollection 2021 Dec.
One-Year Outcomes of Postintensive Care Syndrome in Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients: A Single Institutional Study


Aya Banno[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Toru Hifumi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yuta Takahashi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mitsuhito Soh[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ayako Sakaguchi[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Shodai Shimano[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Yoshie Miyahara[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Shutaro Isokawa[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kenji Ishii[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Kazuhiro Aoki[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Norio Otani[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shinichi Ishimatsu[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Importance: Postintensive care syndrome has a strong impact on coronavirus disease 2019 survivors.
Objectives: Assess the 1-year prevalence of postintensive care syndrome after coronavirus disease 2019.
Design setting and participants: This was a single-center prospective cohort using questionnaires and telephone calls from 4 months to 1 year after ICU discharge. Patients who were treated for coronavirus disease 2019-related acute respiratory distress between March 19, 2020, and April 30, 2020, participated.
Main outcomes and measures: Postintensive care syndrome was evaluated according to physical, mental, and cognitive domains. We surveyed the 8-item standardized Short Form questionnaire for assessing physical postintensive care syndrome; the Impact of Event Scale-Revised and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for assessing mental postintensive care syndrome; and Short-Memory Questionnaire for assessing cognitive postintensive care syndrome. The primary outcome was postintensive care syndrome occurrence of any domain at 1 year. Furthermore, the co-occurrence of the three postintensive care syndrome domains was assessed.
Results: Eighteen patients consented to the study and completed the survey. The median age was 57.5 years, and 78% of the patients were male. Median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II score was 18. During ICU stay, 78% received invasive mechanical ventilation, and 83% received systemic steroid administration. Early mobilization was implemented in 61%. Delirium occurred in 44%. The median days of ICU and hospital stay were 6 and 23.5, respectively. Overall postintensive care syndrome occurrence was 67%. Physical, mental, and cognitive postintensive care syndrome occurred in 56%, 50%, and 33% of patients, respectively. The co-occurrence of all three domains of postintensive care syndrome was 28%. Age and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II scores were higher, and systemic steroids were more commonly used in the postintensive care syndrome groups compared with the nonpostintensive care syndrome groups. Chronic symptoms were more common in the postintensive care syndrome groups than the nonpostintensive care syndrome groups.
Conclusions and relevance: Patients who suffered critical illness from coronavirus disease 2019 had a high frequency of postintensive care syndrome after 1 year. Long-term follow-up and care should be continuously offered.

Keywords: 1 year; coronavirus disease 2019; critical care; intensive care unit; postintensive care syndrome; questionnaire.
 
Back
Top Bottom