• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. Public health communication in time of crisis: Readability of On-Line COVID-19 Information

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020 May 11:1-10. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.151. [Epub ahead of print]
Public health communication in time of crisis: Readability of On-Line COVID-19 Information.


Basch CH[SUP]1[/SUP], Mohlman J[SUP]2[/SUP], Hillyer GC[SUP]3[/SUP], Garcia P[SUP]1[/SUP].

Author information




Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

The purpose of this study was to assess the readability of information on the Internet posted about COVID-19 to determine how closely these materials are written to the recommended reading levels.
METHODS:

Using the search term "coronavirus," information posted on the first 100 English language websites was identified. Using an online readability calculator, multiple readability tests were conducted to assure a comprehensive representation would result.
RESULTS:

The mean readability scores ranged between grade levels 6.2 and 17.8 (graduate school level). Four of the five measures (GFI, CLI, SMOG, FRE) found that readability exceeded the 10th grade reading level indicating that the text of these websites would be difficult for the average American to read. The mean reading level for nearly all non-commercial and commercial websites was at or above the 10th grade reading level.
DISCUSSION:

Messages about COVID-19 must be readable at an 'easy' level, and must contain clear guidelines for behavior. The degree to which individuals seek information in response to risk messages is positively related to the expectation that the information will resolve uncertainty. However, if the information is too complex to interpret and it fails to lead to disambiguation this can contribute to feelings of panic.



KEYWORDS:

COVID-19; on-line information; readability


PMID:32389144DOI:10.1017/dmp.2020.151
 
Back
Top Bottom