• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Establishing Monitored Premises Status for Continuity of Business Permits During an HPAI Outbreak

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Jun 22;5:129. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00129. eCollection 2018.
[h=1]Establishing Monitored Premises Status for Continuity of Business Permits During an HPAI Outbreak.[/h] Umber J[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Johnson R[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Kromm M[SUP]3[/SUP], Linskens E[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Culhane MR[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Goldsmith T[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Halvorson D[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Cardona C[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Recent experiences with avian influenza outbreaks in poultry in the United States have tested biosecurity protocols and outbreak management strategies. During an outbreak, regulatory officials managing the emergency response need to make timely decisions in order to achieve disease control and eradication goals while simultaneously decreasing the unintended consequences of the response. To move susceptible animals or animal products out of a disease Control Area via a secure food supply continuity of business (COB) permit without the risk of expanding a disease outbreak, premises must be designated as Monitored Premises (MP) by regulatory officials. The experience of and lessons learned from the 2014 to 2015 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreak have resulted in defined criteria necessary to establish MP status during an HPAI outbreak and highlighted the need for a clear method to determine that those criteria have been met. Establishing MP status is different from an epidemiologic investigation, though they both require analyses of how avian influenza virus may enter poultry premises and can take significant staff time. MP status of premises seeking to move animals or animal products must be continuously re-evaluated as Infected Premises status, and resulting epidemiologic contacts, can rapidly change during an outbreak. We present here a questionnaire to establish MP status, designed to be initially completed by industry representatives in an attempt to streamline processes and conserve resources. During an outbreak, the MP status questionnaire is an essential risk-based management tool used to establish premises status, as part of operationalizing permitted movement to support COB.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] HPAI; continuity of business; disease outbreaks; monitored premises; permit; permitted movement; questionnaire

PMID: 29988387 PMCID: PMC6024006 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00129
Free PMC Article
 
Back
Top Bottom