• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Expert Rev Vaccines . Modeling the potential public health and economic impact of different COVID-19 booster dose vaccination strategies with an ad

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Expert Rev Vaccines


. 2024 Jul 29.
doi: 10.1080/14760584.2024.2383343. Online ahead of print. Modeling the potential public health and economic impact of different COVID-19 booster dose vaccination strategies with an adapted vaccine in the United Kingdom

Cale Harrison[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rebecca Butfield[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ben Yarnoff[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jingyan Yang[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Updating vaccines is essential for combatting emerging coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) variants. This study assessed the public health and economic impact of a booster dose of an adapted vaccine in the United Kingdom (UK).
Methods: A Markov-decision tree model estimated the outcomes of vaccination strategies targeting various age and risk groups in the UK. Age-specific data derived from published sources were used. The model estimated case numbers, deaths, hospitalizations, medical costs, and societal costs. Scenario analyses were conducted to explore uncertainty.
Results: Vaccination targeting individuals aged ≥65 years and the high-risk population aged 12-64 years was estimated to avert 701,549 symptomatic cases, 5,599 deaths 18,086 hospitalizations 56,326 post-COVID condition cases, and 38,263 lost quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), translating into direct and societal cost savings of £112,174,054 and £542,758,682, respectively. The estimated economically justifiable price at willingness-to-pay thresholds of £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY was £43 and £61, respectively, from the payer perspective and £64 and £82, respectively, from the societal perspective. Expanding to additional age groups improved the public health impact.
Conclusions: Targeting individuals aged ≥65 years and those aged 12-64 years at high risk yields public health gains, but expansion to additional age groups provides additional gains.

Keywords: Adapted vaccine; Booster vaccine; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; United Kingdom.

 
Back
Top Bottom