• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Immunol . Effectiveness of COVID-19 XBB.1.5 monovalent mRNA vaccine in Korea: interim analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Immunol


. 2024 May 13:15:1382944.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1382944. eCollection 2024. Effectiveness of COVID-19 XBB.1.5 monovalent mRNA vaccine in Korea: interim analysis

Eliel Nham[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Jang Wook Sohn[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Won Suk Choi[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Seong-Heon Wie[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jacob Lee[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jin-Soo Lee[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Hye Won Jeong[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Joong Sik Eom[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Yu Jung Choi[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Hye Seong[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Jin Gu Yoon[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ji Yun Noh[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Joon Young Song[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Hee Jin Cheong[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Woo Joo Kim[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

As coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) becomes an endemic disease, the virus continues to evolve and become immunologically distinct from previous strains. Immune imprinting has raised concerns about bivalent mRNA vaccines containing both ancestral virus and Omicron variant. To increase efficacy against the predominant strains as of the second half of 2023, the updated vaccine formulation contained only the mRNA of XBB.1.5 sublineage. We conducted a multicenter, test-negative, case-control study to estimate XBB.1.5 monovalent vaccine effectiveness (VE) and present the results of an interim analysis with data collected in November 2023. Patients who underwent COVID-19 testing at eight university hospitals were included and matched based on age (19-49, 50-64, and ≥65 years) and sex in a 1:1 ratio. VE was calculated using the adjusted odds ratio derived from multivariable logistic regression. Of the 992 patients included, 49 (5.3%) received the XBB.1.5 monovalent vaccine at least 7 days before COVID-19 testing. Patients with COVID-19 (cases) were less likely to have received the XBB.1.5 monovalent vaccine (case 3.5% vs. control 7.2%, p=0.019) and to have a history of COVID-19 within 6 months (2.2% vs. 4.6%, p=0.068). In contrast, patients with COVID-19 were more likely to be healthcare workers (8.2% vs. 3.0%, p=0.001) and to have chronic neurological diseases (16.7% vs. 11.9%, p=0.048). The adjusted VE of the XBB.1.5 monovalent mRNA vaccine was 56.8% (95% confidence interval: 18.7-77.9%). XBB.1.5 monovalent mRNA vaccine provided significant protection against COVID-19 in the first one to two months after vaccination.

Keywords: COVID-19; Omicron; SARS-CoV-2; XBB.1.5; effectiveness; vaccine.

 
Back
Top Bottom