tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Public Health
. 2024 Jun 20:12:1353415.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1353415. eCollection 2024. Protective effectiveness of previous infection against subsequent SARS-Cov-2 infection: systematic review and meta-analysis
Wei-Hua Hu[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Huan-Le Cai[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Huan-Chang Yan[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Han Wang[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Hui-Min Sun[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Yong-Yue Wei[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Yuan-Tao Hao[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Background: The protective effectiveness provided by naturally acquired immunity against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection remain controversial.
Objective: To systematically evaluate the protective effect of natural immunity against subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection with different variants.
Methods: We searched for related studies published in seven databases before March 5, 2023. Eligible studies included in the analysis reported the risk of subsequent infection for groups with or without a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome was the overall pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection/infection between the two groups. We also focused on the protective effectiveness of natural immunity against reinfection/infection with different SARS-CoV-2 variants. We used a random-effects model to pool the data, and obtained the bias-adjusted results using the trim-and-fill method. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding included studies one by one to evaluate the stability of the results.
Results: We identified 40 eligible articles including more than 20 million individuals without the history of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The bias-adjusted efficacy of naturally acquired antibodies against reinfection was estimated at 65% (pooled IRR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.26-0.47), with higher efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19 cases (pooled IRR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.08-0.26) than asymptomatic infection (pooled IRR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.29-0.54). Meta-regression revealed that SARS-CoV-2 variant was a statistically significant effect modifier, which explaining 46.40% of the variation in IRRs. For different SARS-CoV-2 variant, the pooled IRRs for the Alpha (pooled IRR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.06-0.19), Delta (pooled IRR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.15-0.24) and Omicron (pooled IRR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.42-0.87) variant were higher and higher. In other subgroup analyses, the pooled IRRs of SARS-CoV-2 infection were statistically various in different countries, publication year and the inclusion end time of population, with a significant difference (p = 0.02, p < 0.010 and p < 0.010), respectively. The risk of subsequent infection in the seropositive population appeared to increase slowly over time. Despite the heterogeneity in included studies, sensitivity analyses showed stable results.
Conclusion: Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection provides protection against pre-omicron reinfection, but less against omicron. Ongoing viral mutation requires attention and prevention strategies, such as vaccine catch-up, in conjunction with multiple factors.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; naturally infection; protective effectiveness; reinfection; variant.
. 2024 Jun 20:12:1353415.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1353415. eCollection 2024. Protective effectiveness of previous infection against subsequent SARS-Cov-2 infection: systematic review and meta-analysis
Wei-Hua Hu[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Huan-Le Cai[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Huan-Chang Yan[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Han Wang[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Hui-Min Sun[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Yong-Yue Wei[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Yuan-Tao Hao[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 38966699
- PMCID: PMC11222391
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1353415
Background: The protective effectiveness provided by naturally acquired immunity against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection remain controversial.
Objective: To systematically evaluate the protective effect of natural immunity against subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection with different variants.
Methods: We searched for related studies published in seven databases before March 5, 2023. Eligible studies included in the analysis reported the risk of subsequent infection for groups with or without a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome was the overall pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection/infection between the two groups. We also focused on the protective effectiveness of natural immunity against reinfection/infection with different SARS-CoV-2 variants. We used a random-effects model to pool the data, and obtained the bias-adjusted results using the trim-and-fill method. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding included studies one by one to evaluate the stability of the results.
Results: We identified 40 eligible articles including more than 20 million individuals without the history of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The bias-adjusted efficacy of naturally acquired antibodies against reinfection was estimated at 65% (pooled IRR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.26-0.47), with higher efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19 cases (pooled IRR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.08-0.26) than asymptomatic infection (pooled IRR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.29-0.54). Meta-regression revealed that SARS-CoV-2 variant was a statistically significant effect modifier, which explaining 46.40% of the variation in IRRs. For different SARS-CoV-2 variant, the pooled IRRs for the Alpha (pooled IRR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.06-0.19), Delta (pooled IRR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.15-0.24) and Omicron (pooled IRR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.42-0.87) variant were higher and higher. In other subgroup analyses, the pooled IRRs of SARS-CoV-2 infection were statistically various in different countries, publication year and the inclusion end time of population, with a significant difference (p = 0.02, p < 0.010 and p < 0.010), respectively. The risk of subsequent infection in the seropositive population appeared to increase slowly over time. Despite the heterogeneity in included studies, sensitivity analyses showed stable results.
Conclusion: Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection provides protection against pre-omicron reinfection, but less against omicron. Ongoing viral mutation requires attention and prevention strategies, such as vaccine catch-up, in conjunction with multiple factors.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; naturally infection; protective effectiveness; reinfection; variant.