• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Public Health . Toward resilience for public health emergency response system during COVID-19: qualitative comparative analyses of 40 countrie

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Public Health


. 2025 Sep 18:13:1652309.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1652309. eCollection 2025. Toward resilience for public health emergency response system during COVID-19: qualitative comparative analyses of 40 countries

Lingzhi Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yifan Tang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mengxia Zhu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yudi Chen[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Peng Cui[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

As a critical defense mechanism against COVID-19, the national public health emergency response system (PHERS) with high resilience enables effective identification, absorption, and resistance of epidemic crises. This resilience is essential for safeguarding public health and rapidly restoring social stability. However, existing studies primarily focus on single-aspect strategies in specific countries, lacking a systematic understanding of how resilience strategies influence PHERS resilience outcomes. Therefore, this study aims to establish evidence-based and configurational resilience strategies to improve the effectiveness of PHERS in responding to epidemic threats. This study proposes a theoretical framework to characterize resilience strategies and resilience outcomes for PHERS. The fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method is applied to analyze data from 40 countries during the COVID-19 crisis. The findings reveal three configuration paths to enhance robustness and three paths to enhance rapidity. These results emphasize the importance of the synergistic implementation of containment and closures, travel control, public personal protection, and early virus detection in improving PHERS resilience. This study provides a structured approach to understanding PHERS resilience by identifying key configuration paths that enhance robustness and rapidity. The results offer actionable insights for designing resilient PHERS to better respond to future epidemics.

Keywords: COVID-19; configuration analysis; fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis; public health emergency response system (PHERS); resilience.

 
Back
Top Bottom