tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
IJID Reg
. 2023 May 4.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.02.009. Online ahead of print. Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus among boarding school girls
Clara Devina[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Badai Buana Nasution[SUP] 1 [/SUP], R Lia Kusumawati[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Rini Savitri Daulay[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yunnie Trisnawati[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Inke Nadia Diniyanti Lubis[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Objectives: With the reopening of schools, the detection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children is very important in order to prevent outbreaks in schools and to reduce the risk of more severe post-COVID-19 complications. Various specimens can be used to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and saliva has been considered as an alternative specimen in adults. However, data in children are lacking, especially among the female population. This study compared the efficacy of saliva specimens with nasopharyngeal swab specimens for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
Methods: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of saliva among boarding school girls at three time points: diagnosis, and days 7 and 14 since first confirmation using a nasopharyngeal swab specimen. Eighty-four paired samples from 36 individuals were compared. Nasopharyngeal samplings were carried out by trained health officers, while saliva samplings were performed independently by children.
Results: The overall percentage agreement (OPA) between saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs was 50.2%. The OPA was 52.8% at diagnosis, and this increased slightly to 54.2% at day 7, and subsequently decreased to 45.8% at day 14. Saliva specimens had sensitivity of 44.6%, specificity of 80.0%, positive predictive value of 94.2% and negative predictive value of 16.3% compared with nasopharyngeal swab specimens for the diagnosis of COVID-19.
Conclusions: The use of saliva as an alternative specimen for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in children should be considered carefully. Thorough sampling instructions should be given in order to minimize bias in the findings.
Keywords: COVID-19; Children; Diagnosis; Saliva.
. 2023 May 4.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.02.009. Online ahead of print. Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus among boarding school girls
Clara Devina[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Badai Buana Nasution[SUP] 1 [/SUP], R Lia Kusumawati[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Rini Savitri Daulay[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yunnie Trisnawati[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Inke Nadia Diniyanti Lubis[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 37363192
- PMCID: PMC10157386
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.02.009
Objectives: With the reopening of schools, the detection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children is very important in order to prevent outbreaks in schools and to reduce the risk of more severe post-COVID-19 complications. Various specimens can be used to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and saliva has been considered as an alternative specimen in adults. However, data in children are lacking, especially among the female population. This study compared the efficacy of saliva specimens with nasopharyngeal swab specimens for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
Methods: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of saliva among boarding school girls at three time points: diagnosis, and days 7 and 14 since first confirmation using a nasopharyngeal swab specimen. Eighty-four paired samples from 36 individuals were compared. Nasopharyngeal samplings were carried out by trained health officers, while saliva samplings were performed independently by children.
Results: The overall percentage agreement (OPA) between saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs was 50.2%. The OPA was 52.8% at diagnosis, and this increased slightly to 54.2% at day 7, and subsequently decreased to 45.8% at day 14. Saliva specimens had sensitivity of 44.6%, specificity of 80.0%, positive predictive value of 94.2% and negative predictive value of 16.3% compared with nasopharyngeal swab specimens for the diagnosis of COVID-19.
Conclusions: The use of saliva as an alternative specimen for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in children should be considered carefully. Thorough sampling instructions should be given in order to minimize bias in the findings.
Keywords: COVID-19; Children; Diagnosis; Saliva.