tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Formos Med Assoc. 2011 Dec;110(12):780-6. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
Immunogenicity and safety of an AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine in a Taiwanese population.
Hwang SJ, Chang SC, Yu CJ, Chan YJ, Chen TJ, Hsieh SL, Lai HY, Lin MH, Liu JY, Ong G, Roman F, Dram? M, Bock HL, Yang PC.
Source
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 201 Section 2, Shih-Pai Road, and National Yang Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE:
A multicenter study (NCT00449670) conducted across Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong and Thailand evaluated the safety and manufacturing consistency of four formulations of an AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine in terms of immune response against the vaccine-homologous strain (A/Vietnam/1194/2004). This manuscript presents data from the Taiwanese population.
METHODS:
A total of 400 individuals, aged 18-60 years, were randomized into six groups (2:2:2:2:1:1 ratio) to receive two doses (21 days apart) of one of the four adjuvanted formulations (H5N1-AS03(A)-groups) or one of the two nonadjuvanted formulations (H5N1-DIL-groups). Blood samples collected before vaccination (Day 0) and 21 days after each vaccine dose were analyzed using hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay. Adverse events were recorded.
RESULTS:
All four AS03(A)-adjuvanted formulations induced comparable immune responses against the A/Vietnam/1194/2004 strain; following the second dose, immune response in terms of HI antibodies was higher in the H5N1-AS03(A)-groups {seroprotection rate=91.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 87.9-94.4]; geometric mean titer (GMT)=177.6 (95% CI: 153.2-206.0)} compared with the H5N1-DIL-groups [seroprotection rates=5.0% (95% CI: 1.4-12.3); GMT=6.3 (95% CI: 5.4-7.4)]. Immune response against the heterologous A/Indonesia/05/2005 strain was also stronger in the H5N1-AS03(A)-groups [seroprotection rate=45.6% (95% CI: 40.0-51.4); GMT=20.5 (95% CI: 17.8-23.7)] compared with the H5N1-DIL groups [seroprotection rate=0.0% (95% CI: 0.0-4.5); GMT=5.0 (95% CI: 5.0-5.0)]. The overall reactogenicity profile of the adjuvanted formulations was clinically acceptable.
CONCLUSION:
The AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine formulations induced stronger immune response against the vaccine-homologous and heterologous strains than the nonadjuvanted formulations. The AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine demonstrated a good immunogenicity and an acceptable safety profile in the Taiwanese population.
Copyright ? 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V.
PMID:
22248833
[PubMed - in process]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22248833
Immunogenicity and safety of an AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine in a Taiwanese population.
Hwang SJ, Chang SC, Yu CJ, Chan YJ, Chen TJ, Hsieh SL, Lai HY, Lin MH, Liu JY, Ong G, Roman F, Dram? M, Bock HL, Yang PC.
Source
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 201 Section 2, Shih-Pai Road, and National Yang Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE:
A multicenter study (NCT00449670) conducted across Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong and Thailand evaluated the safety and manufacturing consistency of four formulations of an AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine in terms of immune response against the vaccine-homologous strain (A/Vietnam/1194/2004). This manuscript presents data from the Taiwanese population.
METHODS:
A total of 400 individuals, aged 18-60 years, were randomized into six groups (2:2:2:2:1:1 ratio) to receive two doses (21 days apart) of one of the four adjuvanted formulations (H5N1-AS03(A)-groups) or one of the two nonadjuvanted formulations (H5N1-DIL-groups). Blood samples collected before vaccination (Day 0) and 21 days after each vaccine dose were analyzed using hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay. Adverse events were recorded.
RESULTS:
All four AS03(A)-adjuvanted formulations induced comparable immune responses against the A/Vietnam/1194/2004 strain; following the second dose, immune response in terms of HI antibodies was higher in the H5N1-AS03(A)-groups {seroprotection rate=91.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 87.9-94.4]; geometric mean titer (GMT)=177.6 (95% CI: 153.2-206.0)} compared with the H5N1-DIL-groups [seroprotection rates=5.0% (95% CI: 1.4-12.3); GMT=6.3 (95% CI: 5.4-7.4)]. Immune response against the heterologous A/Indonesia/05/2005 strain was also stronger in the H5N1-AS03(A)-groups [seroprotection rate=45.6% (95% CI: 40.0-51.4); GMT=20.5 (95% CI: 17.8-23.7)] compared with the H5N1-DIL groups [seroprotection rate=0.0% (95% CI: 0.0-4.5); GMT=5.0 (95% CI: 5.0-5.0)]. The overall reactogenicity profile of the adjuvanted formulations was clinically acceptable.
CONCLUSION:
The AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine formulations induced stronger immune response against the vaccine-homologous and heterologous strains than the nonadjuvanted formulations. The AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine demonstrated a good immunogenicity and an acceptable safety profile in the Taiwanese population.
Copyright ? 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V.
PMID:
22248833
[PubMed - in process]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22248833