• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Infect Dis . Evaluation of a Multiplex PCR Panel for the Microbiologic Diagnosis of Pneumonia in Hospitalized Patients: Experience from an Aca

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Infect Dis


. 2021 Jan 9;S1201-9712(21)00007-2.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.004. Online ahead of print.
Evaluation of a Multiplex PCR Panel for the Microbiologic Diagnosis of Pneumonia in Hospitalized Patients: Experience from an Academic Medical Center


Ioannis M Zacharioudakis[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fainareti N Zervou[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Dubrovskaya Yanina[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kenneth Inglima[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Benjamin See[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Maria Aguero-Rosenfeld[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the value of BioFire? FilmArray? pneumonia panel in establishing a microbiologic diagnosis of pneumonia. We evaluated opportunities for antimicrobial optimization from its use.
Methods: We included adult patients with pneumonia between May 2019-January 2020. The pneumonia panel was performed on high-quality sputum specimens and the results were prospectively compared with sputum cultures and other tests performed per standard of care.
Results: Seventy patients were included, sixty-nine of whom completed a 5-day antimicrobial course for pneumonia and 14.3% died during hospitalization. There was a trend of higher rate of microbiologic diagnosis among the patients with culture submitted before antimicrobial administration (9/15 vs. 20/55; p = 0.09). The panel increased the microbiologic diagnosis from 29/70 to 59/70 (p < 0.001) patients. The per isolate analysis revealed an increase in the isolation of Haemophilus influenzae (p = 0.002) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (p = 0.05). On review of empiric antimicrobials, there was potential for antimicrobial optimization in 56/70 patients, including 9 bacteria among 9 patients, not covered by empiric treatment and another 70 antimicrobials in 49 patients that could have been stopped.
Conclusions: Incorporation of the pneumonia panel in the diagnostic work-up of pneumonia substantially increased the rate of microbiologic diagnosis and revealed abundant opportunities for antimicrobial optimization.
 
Back
Top Bottom