• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Intradermal vaccination using the novel microneedle device MicronJet600: past, present and future

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015 Mar 6:0. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Intradermal vaccination using the novel microneedle device MicronJet600: past, present and future.[/h] Levin Y[SUP]1[/SUP], Kochba E, Hung I, Kenney R.
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Intradermal immunization has become a forefront of vaccine improvement, both scientifically and commercially. Newer technologies are being developed to address the need to reduce the dose required for vaccination and to improve the reliability and ease of injection, which have been major hurdles in expanding the number of approved vaccines using this route of administration. In this review, seven years of clinical experience with a novel intradermal delivery device, the MicronJet600, which is a registered hollow microneedle that simplifies the delivery of liquid vaccines, are summarized. This device has demonstrated both significant dose-sparing and superior immunogenicity in various vaccine categories, as well as in diverse subject populations and age groups. These studies have shown that intradermal delivery using this device is safe, effective, and preferred by the subjects. Comparison with other intradermal devices and potential new applications for intradermal delivery that could be pursued in the future are also discussed.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] AE, adverse event; BCG, Bacillus Calmette?Gu?rin; BD, Becton Dickinson; CDC, Center of Disease Control; DTP, diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus; EMEA, European Medicines Agency; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; GMT, geometric mean titer; HA, hemagglutinin; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HIV, Human immunodeficiency virus; HPV, human papilloma virus; ID, intradermal; IM, Intramuscular; IPV, inactivated polio vaccine; MEMS, Micro Electro Mechanical System; Mantoux; PPD, Purified protein derivative; SAGE, Strategic Advisory Group of Experts; SQ, subcutaneous; WHO, World Health Organization; dose-sparing; icddr,b, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh; immunogenicity; influenza vaccine; intradermal; microneedles; vaccine delivery; vaccine device

PMID: 25745830 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom