• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Intraseason decline in influenza vaccine effectiveness during the 2016 southern hemisphere influenza season: A test-negative design study and phylogen

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2019 Apr 2. pii: S0264-410X(19)30222-1. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.027. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Intraseason decline in influenza vaccine effectiveness during the 2016 southern hemisphere influenza season: A test-negative design study and phylogenetic assessment.[/h] Regan AK[SUP]1[/SUP], Fielding JE[SUP]2[/SUP], Chilver MB[SUP]3[/SUP], Carville KS[SUP]4[/SUP], Minney-Smith CA[SUP]5[/SUP], Grant KA[SUP]4[/SUP], Thomson C[SUP]6[/SUP], Hahesy T[SUP]7[/SUP], Deng YM[SUP]8[/SUP], Stocks N[SUP]3[/SUP], Sullivan SG[SUP]9[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] We estimated the effectiveness of seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine and the potential influence of timing of immunization on vaccine effectiveness (VE) using data from the 2016 southern hemisphere influenza season.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Data were pooled from three routine syndromic sentinel surveillance systems in general practices in Australia. Each system routinely collected specimens for influenza testing from patients presenting with influenza-like illness. Next generation sequencing was used to characterize viruses. Using a test-negative design, VE was estimated based on the odds of vaccination among influenza-positive cases as compared to influenza-negative controls. Subgroup analyses were used to estimate VE by type, subtype and lineage, as well as age group and time between vaccination and symptom onset.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] A total of 1085 patients tested for influenza in 2016 were included in the analysis, of whom 447 (41%) tested positive for influenza. The majority of detections were influenza A/H3N2 (74%). One-third (31%) of patients received the 2016 southern hemisphere formulation influenza vaccine. Overall, VE was estimated at 40% (95% CI: 18-56%). VE estimates were highest for patients immunized within two months prior to symptom onset (VE: 60%; 95% CI: 26-78%) and lowest for patients immunized >4 months prior to symptom onset (VE: 19%; 95% CI: -73-62%).
[h=4]DISCUSSION:[/h] Overall, the 2016 influenza vaccine showed good protection against laboratory-confirmed infection among general practice patients. Results by duration of vaccination suggest a significant decline in effectiveness during the 2016 influenza season, indicating immunization close to influenza season offered optimal protection.
Crown Copyright ? 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Case-control study; Influenza; Influenza vaccines; Test-negative design; Vaccine effectiveness

PMID: 30952499 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.027
 
Back
Top Bottom