• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Case Rep . Seven-month persistence of COVID-19 vaccine-induced lymphadenopathy: a case report

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Case Rep


. 2025 Mar 27;19(1):143.
doi: 10.1186/s13256-025-05188-0. Seven-month persistence of COVID-19 vaccine-induced lymphadenopathy: a case report

Matthew K Hwang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hemi Dua[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Anna Marie Mulligan[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Jaime Escallon[SUP] 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Lymphadenopathy is a known side effect of both messenger RNA and viral vector coronavirus disease-2019 vaccines and can cause a spectrum of findings. Coronavirus disease-2019 vaccine-associated lymphadenopathy typically resolves within 60 days after administration of the dose.
Case presentation: A 59 year old Chinese woman underwent routine mammographic screening that revealed scattered areas of fibroglandular densities in the lower-inner quadrant of the left breast and abnormal lymph nodes. A core biopsy of the breast identified ductal carcinoma in situ. A biopsy of the lymph nodes was performed, and histological findings and immunophenotype were consistent with lymphoid hyperplasia. This patient had sought medical attention after she detected swelling in her left supraclavicular fossa 7 months earlier. She had received the first dose of the Pfizer coronavirus disease-2019 vaccine in the left deltoid muscle 7 days prior to presenting with left supraclavicular fossa swelling.
Conclusion: After reviewing the history, imaging, and pathology, it was concluded through a diagnosis of exclusion that the observed enlarged left axillary lymph nodes with reactive histology were probably related to the coronavirus disease-2019 vaccine administration and not to ductal carcinoma in situ or an undetected invasive cancer. Clinicians and radiologists need to be aware of the potential for abnormal presentations of persistent lymphadenopathy that may interfere with the diagnosis and follow-up of cancers.

Keywords: COVID-19; Lymphadenopathy; Vaccine.

 
Back
Top Bottom