tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol
. 2024 Dec;96(12):e70070.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.70070. COVID-19 and Oncofertility: No SARS-CoV-2 in Semen but Inflammation Seems to Affect Sperm Parameters
Chaput Laure[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Pons-Rejraji Hanae[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Chabrolles Hélène[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Fiot Mélanie[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Lucas Cécily[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pereira Bruno[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Bonnet Benjamin[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Haj Hamid Rahaf[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Rives-Feraille Aurélie[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Binois Olivier[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Ferreux Lucile[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Delepine Béatrice[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Koscinski Isabelle[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Lichtblau Isabelle[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Giscard d'Estaing Sandrine[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Bendayan Marion[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Saias-Magnan Jacqueline[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Lousqui Johanna[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Henquell Cécile[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Brugnon Florence[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
The COVID-19 pandemic, driven by SARS-CoV-2, led authorities to recommend halting assisted reproductive technology programs, focusing instead on fertility preservation, for cancer patients. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in semen remains controversial. This multicentric prospective cohort study, conducted across 12 university medical centers, aimed to determine if SARS-CoV-2 is present in spermatozoa/seminal plasma in cancer patients by RT-PCR and to assess its impact on standard semen parameters. The levels of cytokines and TNF-α were measured in seminal fluid by ELISA. We enrolled 129 men who underwent sperm cryopreservation between July 7, 2020, and June 30, 2021. The 63 were included and tested for COVID-19 in nasal swab samples by RT-PCR and/or by serology. All patients were asymptomatic on the day of semen collection: 50 were uninfected, 8 had a positive nasal swab (PCR+) and 5 were seropositive. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected in the seminal fluid or spermatozoa. Ejaculate volume was significantly lower in the PCR+ group compared to the uninfected group (median [IQR]: 2.6 mL [1.6-3.4] vs. 4.6 mL [2.6-5.2] p < 0.05). Total and progressive motility were lower in the PCR+ group compared to the seropositive group (32.5% [25.0-45.0] vs. 50% [49.0-55.0] p < 0.05, and 22.5% [10.0; 32.5] vs. 44.5% [40-49] p < 0.05). Higher TNF-α level was observed in the PCR+ group (1.9 pg/mL [0-3.9]) compared to the uninfected group (0 pg/mL [0-0.4]) p < 0.05. Although SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the sperm samples of cancer patients who were PCR+, the infection appears to impact sperm parameters, likely due to inflammation.
Keywords: SARS‐CoV‐2; cancer; fertility preservation; semen parameters; seminal fluid inflammation.
. 2024 Dec;96(12):e70070.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.70070. COVID-19 and Oncofertility: No SARS-CoV-2 in Semen but Inflammation Seems to Affect Sperm Parameters
Chaput Laure[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Pons-Rejraji Hanae[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Chabrolles Hélène[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Fiot Mélanie[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Lucas Cécily[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pereira Bruno[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Bonnet Benjamin[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Haj Hamid Rahaf[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Rives-Feraille Aurélie[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Binois Olivier[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Ferreux Lucile[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Delepine Béatrice[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Koscinski Isabelle[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Lichtblau Isabelle[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Giscard d'Estaing Sandrine[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Bendayan Marion[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Saias-Magnan Jacqueline[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Lousqui Johanna[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Henquell Cécile[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Brugnon Florence[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 39648939
- DOI: 10.1002/jmv.70070
The COVID-19 pandemic, driven by SARS-CoV-2, led authorities to recommend halting assisted reproductive technology programs, focusing instead on fertility preservation, for cancer patients. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in semen remains controversial. This multicentric prospective cohort study, conducted across 12 university medical centers, aimed to determine if SARS-CoV-2 is present in spermatozoa/seminal plasma in cancer patients by RT-PCR and to assess its impact on standard semen parameters. The levels of cytokines and TNF-α were measured in seminal fluid by ELISA. We enrolled 129 men who underwent sperm cryopreservation between July 7, 2020, and June 30, 2021. The 63 were included and tested for COVID-19 in nasal swab samples by RT-PCR and/or by serology. All patients were asymptomatic on the day of semen collection: 50 were uninfected, 8 had a positive nasal swab (PCR+) and 5 were seropositive. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected in the seminal fluid or spermatozoa. Ejaculate volume was significantly lower in the PCR+ group compared to the uninfected group (median [IQR]: 2.6 mL [1.6-3.4] vs. 4.6 mL [2.6-5.2] p < 0.05). Total and progressive motility were lower in the PCR+ group compared to the seropositive group (32.5% [25.0-45.0] vs. 50% [49.0-55.0] p < 0.05, and 22.5% [10.0; 32.5] vs. 44.5% [40-49] p < 0.05). Higher TNF-α level was observed in the PCR+ group (1.9 pg/mL [0-3.9]) compared to the uninfected group (0 pg/mL [0-0.4]) p < 0.05. Although SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the sperm samples of cancer patients who were PCR+, the infection appears to impact sperm parameters, likely due to inflammation.
Keywords: SARS‐CoV‐2; cancer; fertility preservation; semen parameters; seminal fluid inflammation.