• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

JMIR Public Health Surveill . Diagnostic Accuracy of Chest CT Scans for Suspected Patients with COVID-19 in a Retrospective Cohort Study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
JMIR Public Health Surveill


. 2020 Sep 9.
doi: 10.2196/19424. Online ahead of print.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Chest CT Scans for Suspected Patients with COVID-19 in a Retrospective Cohort Study


Lianpin Wu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Qike Jin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jie Chen[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jiawei He[SUP] 1 [/SUP], David M Brett-Major[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jianghu James Dong[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: CT scans are increasingly available in clinical care globally. They enable a rapid and detailed assessment of tissue and organ involvement in disease processes that are relevant to diagnosis and management, particularly since the coronavirus outbreak in the world.
Objective: We wanted to compare CT scan findings of patients that were COVID-19 positive (confirmed via nucleic acid testing) to patients who were confirmed COVID-19 negative.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was proposed to compare patient clinical characteristics and CT scan findings in suspected COVID-19 cases. A multivariable logistic model with LASSO selection for variables was used to identify the good predictors from all available predictors. The area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval was calculated for each of the selected predictors and these combined selected key predictors.
Results: A total of 94 (56%) patients were confirmed positive for COVID-19 from the suspected 167 patients. We found that elderly people were more likely to be infected by COVID-19. Among the 94 confirmed positive patients, 2 (2%) patients were admitted to an intensive care unit, and 0 (0%) patients died during the study period. We found that the presence, distribution, and location of CT lesions was associated with the presence of COVID-19. White blood cell counts, cough, and a contact history of Wuhan also were the top predictors for COVID-19. The overall AUC of these selected predictors is 0.97 (0.93, 1.00).
Conclusions: Taken together with nucleic acid testing, we find that CT scans can allow for the rapid diagnosis of COVID-19. This study suggests that chest CT scans should be more broadly adopted along with nucleic acid testing in the initial assessment of suspected COVID-19 cases, especially for patients with non-specific symptoms.
 
Back
Top Bottom