• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Lancet: Estimating the cost of vaccine development against epidemic infectious diseases: a cost minimisation study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
[h=1]Estimating the cost of vaccine development against epidemic infectious diseases: a cost minimisation study[/h]
Open AccessPublished:October 17, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30346-2
[h=2]Summary[/h] [h=3]Background[/h] The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations was established in 2016, to develop vaccines that can contribute to preparedness for outbreaks of epidemic infectious diseases. Evidence on vaccine development costs for such diseases is scarce. Our goal was to estimate the minimum cost for achieving vaccine research and development preparedness targets in a portfolio of 11 epidemic infectious diseases, accounting for vaccine pipeline constraints and uncertainty in research and development preparedness outcomes.
[h=3]Methods[/h] We assembled a pipeline of 224 vaccine candidates from preclinical through to phase 2 for 11 priority epidemic infectious diseases. We used a linear regression model to identify drivers of development costs from preclinical through to end of phase 2a. Drawing from published estimates of vaccine research and development probabilities of success, we simulated costs for advancing these 224 vaccine candidates through to the end of phase 2a. We combined these findings to determine minimum costs for progressing at least one vaccine through to the end of phase 2a per epidemic infectious disease by means of a stochastic optimisation model.
[h=3]Findings[/h] The cost of developing a single epidemic infectious disease vaccine from preclinical trials through to end of phase 2a is US$31?68 million (US$14?159 million range), assuming no risk of failure. We found that previous licensure experience and indirect costs are upward drivers of research and development costs. Accounting for probability of success, the average cost of successfully advancing at least one epidemic infectious disease vaccine through to the end of phase 2a can vary from US$84?112 million ($23 million?$295 million range) starting from phase 2 to $319?469 million ($137 million?$1?1 billion range) starting from preclinical. This cost includes the cumulative cost of failed vaccine candidates through the research and development process. Assuming these candidates and funding were made available, progressing at least one vaccine through to the end of phase 2a for each of the 11 epidemic infectious diseases would cost a minimum of $2?8?3?7 billion ($1?2 billion?$8?4 billion range).
[h=3]Interpretation[/h] Our analysis provides new evidence on vaccine research and development pipelines and associated costs for 11 epidemic infectious diseases, highlighting both funding needs and research and development gaps for achieving vaccine research and development preparedness targets.
[h=3]Funding[/h] This work was partly supported by the Research Council of Norway through the Global Health and Vaccination Programme GLOBVAC.

full article

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(18)30346-2/fulltext
 
Back
Top Bottom