• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Letters designed with behavioural science increase influenza vaccination in Medicare beneficiaries

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Oct;2(10):743-749. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0432-2. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
[h=1]Letters designed with behavioural science increase influenza vaccination in Medicare beneficiaries.[/h] Yokum D[SUP]1[/SUP], Lauffenburger JC[SUP]2[/SUP], Ghazinouri R[SUP]2[/SUP], Choudhry NK[SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h] 1 The Lab @ DC, Washington DC, USA. 2 Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS) and Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3 Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS) and Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. nkchoudhry@bwh.harvard.edu.

[h=3]Abstract[/h] The influenza ('flu') vaccination is low cost[SUP]1[/SUP] and effective, typically reducing the likelihood of infection by 50-60%[SUP]2[/SUP]. It is recommended for nearly everyone older than 6 months of age[SUP]3[/SUP]; yet, only 40% of Americans are immunized each year. Vaccination rates are higher among at-risk groups, such as those ≥65 years of age, but still only 6 in 10 receive it[SUP]4[/SUP]. There have been numerous attempts to improve vaccination rates using strategies such as school-based programmes, financial incentives and reminders, but these have generally had limited success[SUP]5-7[/SUP]. Of the attempts that are successful, most are expensive-limiting scalability-and have not been evaluated in the elderly[SUP]8[/SUP]. Conversely, lower-cost interventions, such as mailed information, hold promise for a scalable solution, but their limited effectiveness may result from how they have been designed. We randomly assigned 228,000 individuals ≥66 years of age to one of five versions of letters intended to motivate vaccination, including versions with an implementation intention prompt and an enhanced active choice implementation prompt. We found that a single mailed letter significantly increased influenza vaccination rates compared with no letter. However, there was no difference in vaccination rates across the four different letters tailored with behavioural science techniques.


PMID: 31406294 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0432-2
 
Back
Top Bottom