• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Magnitude of Potential Biases in a Simulated Case-Control Study of the Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Nov 17. [Epub ahead of print]
Magnitude of Potential Biases in a Simulated Case-Control Study of the Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination.
Ferdinands JM, Shay DK.
Source

Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Abstract

Background. Many influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates have been made using case-control methods. Although several forms of bias may distort estimates of vaccine effectiveness derived from case-control studies, there have been few attempts to quantify the magnitude of these biases.Methods. We estimated the magnitude of potential biases in influenza vaccine effectiveness values derived from case-control studies from several factors, including bias from differential use of diagnostic testing based on influenza vaccine status, imperfect diagnostic test characteristics, and confounding. A decision tree model was used to simulate an influenza vaccine effectiveness case-control study in children. Using probability distributions, we varied the value of factors that influence vaccine effectiveness estimates, including diagnostic test characteristics, vaccine coverage, likelihood of receiving a diagnostic test for influenza, likelihood that a child hospitalized with acute respiratory infection had influenza, and others. Bias was measured as the difference between the effectiveness observed in the simulated case-control study and a true underlying effectiveness value.Results and Conclusions. We found an average difference between observed and true vaccine effectiveness of -11.9%. Observed vaccine effectiveness underestimated the true effectiveness in 88% of model iterations. Diagnostic test specificity exhibited the strongest association with observed vaccine effectiveness, followed by the likelihood of receiving a diagnostic test based on vaccination status and the likelihood that a child hospitalized with acute respiratory infection had influenza. Our findings suggest that the potential biases in case-control studies that we examined tend to result in underestimates of true influenza vaccine effects.

PMID:
22095567
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22095567
 
Back
Top Bottom