tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 24;13(8). pii: E1997. doi: 10.3390/ma13081997.
3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic.
Wesemann C[SUP]1[/SUP], Pieralli S[SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Fretwurst T[SUP]3[/SUP], Nold J[SUP]2[/SUP], Nelson K[SUP]3[/SUP], Schmelzeisen R[SUP]3[/SUP], Hellwig E[SUP]4[/SUP], Spies BC[SUP]2[/SUP].
Author information
Abstract
While the number of coronavirus cases from 2019 continues to grow, hospitals are reporting shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) for frontline healthcare workers. Furthermore, PPE for the eyes and mouth, such as face shields, allow for additional protection when working with aerosols. 3-D printing enables the easy and rapid production of lightweight plastic frameworks based on open-source data. The practicality and clinical suitability of four face shields printed using a fused deposition modeling printer were examined. The weight, printing time, and required tools for assembly were evaluated. To assess the clinical suitability, each face shield was worn for one hour by 10 clinicians and rated using a visual analogue scale. The filament weight (21-42 g) and printing time (1:40-3:17 h) differed significantly between the four frames. Likewise, the fit, wearing comfort, space for additional PPE, and protection varied between the designs. For clinical suitability, a chosen design should allow sufficient space for goggles and N95 respirators as well as maximum coverage of the facial area. Consequently, two datasets are recommended. For the final selection of the ideal dataset to be used for printing, scalability and economic efficiency need to be carefully balanced with an acceptable degree of protection.
KEYWORDS:
3-D printing; COVID-19; face shield; personal protective equipment
PMID:32344688DOI:10.3390/ma13081997
Free full text
3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic.
Wesemann C[SUP]1[/SUP], Pieralli S[SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Fretwurst T[SUP]3[/SUP], Nold J[SUP]2[/SUP], Nelson K[SUP]3[/SUP], Schmelzeisen R[SUP]3[/SUP], Hellwig E[SUP]4[/SUP], Spies BC[SUP]2[/SUP].
Author information
Abstract
While the number of coronavirus cases from 2019 continues to grow, hospitals are reporting shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) for frontline healthcare workers. Furthermore, PPE for the eyes and mouth, such as face shields, allow for additional protection when working with aerosols. 3-D printing enables the easy and rapid production of lightweight plastic frameworks based on open-source data. The practicality and clinical suitability of four face shields printed using a fused deposition modeling printer were examined. The weight, printing time, and required tools for assembly were evaluated. To assess the clinical suitability, each face shield was worn for one hour by 10 clinicians and rated using a visual analogue scale. The filament weight (21-42 g) and printing time (1:40-3:17 h) differed significantly between the four frames. Likewise, the fit, wearing comfort, space for additional PPE, and protection varied between the designs. For clinical suitability, a chosen design should allow sufficient space for goggles and N95 respirators as well as maximum coverage of the facial area. Consequently, two datasets are recommended. For the final selection of the ideal dataset to be used for printing, scalability and economic efficiency need to be carefully balanced with an acceptable degree of protection.
KEYWORDS:
3-D printing; COVID-19; face shield; personal protective equipment
PMID:32344688DOI:10.3390/ma13081997
Free full text