• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Nat Med . Effect of Delta variant on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Nat Med


. 2021 Oct 14.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01548-7. Online ahead of print.
Effect of Delta variant on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK


Koen B Pouwels[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Emma Pritchard[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Philippa C Matthews[SUP] 4 5 6 [/SUP], Nicole Stoesser[SUP] 3 4 5 6 [/SUP], David W Eyre[SUP] 3 4 5 7 [/SUP], Karina-Doris Vihta[SUP] 3 8 [/SUP], Thomas House[SUP] 9 10 [/SUP], Jodie Hay[SUP] 11 12 [/SUP], John I Bell[SUP] 13 [/SUP], John N Newton[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Jeremy Farrar[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Derrick Crook[SUP] 3 4 5 6 [/SUP], Duncan Cook[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Emma Rourke[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Ruth Studley[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Tim E A Peto[SUP] 3 4 5 6 [/SUP], Ian Diamond[SUP] 16 [/SUP], A Sarah Walker[SUP] 3 4 5 17 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The effectiveness of the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 vaccines against new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections requires continuous re-evaluation, given the increasingly dominant B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of these vaccines in a large, community-based survey of randomly selected households across the United Kingdom. We found that the effectiveness of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 against infections (new polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive cases) with symptoms or high viral burden is reduced with the B.1.617.2 variant (absolute difference of 10-13% for BNT162b2 and 16% for ChAdOx1) compared to the B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant. The effectiveness of two doses remains at least as great as protection afforded by prior natural infection. The dynamics of immunity after second doses differed significantly between BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1, with greater initial effectiveness against new PCR-positive cases but faster declines in protection against high viral burden and symptomatic infection with BNT162b2. There was no evidence that effectiveness varied by dosing interval, but protection was higher in vaccinated individuals after a prior infection and in younger adults. With B.1.617.2, infections occurring after two vaccinations had similar peak viral burden as those in unvaccinated individuals. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination still reduces new infections, but effectiveness and attenuation of peak viral burden are reduced with B.1.617.2.
 
Back
Top Bottom