• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Determinants of Oseltamivir Efficacy Using Data from Phase 2 Inoculation Studies

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 May 13. [Epub ahead of print]
Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Determinants of Oseltamivir Efficacy Using Data from Phase 2 Inoculation Studies.
Rayner CR, Bulik CC, Kamal MA, Reynolds DK, Toovey S, Hammel JP, Smith PF, Bhavnani SM, Van Wart SA, Ambrose PG, Forrest A.
Source

Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., Nutley, NJ;
Abstract

Given the limited understanding about pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) determinants of oseltamivir efficacy, data from two Phase 2 influenza inoculation studies were evaluated. Healthy volunteers in Studies 1 and 2 were experimentally infected with influenza A/Texas (IC50=0.18 nM) or B/Yamagata (IC50=16.76 nM), respectively. In Study 1, 80 subjects received oral oseltamivir 20, 100, or 200 mg twice daily (BID), 200 mg once daily, or placebo for 5 days. In Study 2, 60 subjects received oral oseltamivir 75 or 150 mg BID or placebo for 5 days. Oseltamivir carboxylate (active metabolite or OC) PK was evaluated using individual PK data and a population PK model to derive individual AUC0-24, Cmin, and Cmax values. Exposure-response relationships were evaluated for continuous (area under composite symptom score curve (AUCSC), area under the viral titer curve, and peak viral titer) and time-to-event (alleviation of composite symptom scores and cessation of viral shedding) efficacy endpoints. Univariable analyses suggested the existence of intuitive and highly statistically significant relationships between OC AUC0-24 evaluated as a 3-group variable and AUCSC, time to alleviation of composite symptom scores, and time to cessation of viral shedding. The upper OC AUC0-24 threshold (∼14,000 ng?hr/mL) was similar among these endpoints. Multivariable analyses failed to demonstrate the influence of study/strain on efficacy endpoints. These results provide the first demonstration of exposure-response relationships for efficacy for oseltamivir against influenza and suggest that OC exposures beyond those achieved with the approved oseltamivir dosing regimen will provide enhanced efficacy. The clinical applicability of these observations requires further investigation.

PMID:
23669386
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23669386
 
Back
Top Bottom