• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . Comparison of DNA extraction methods for COVID-19 host genetics studies

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2023 Oct 30;18(10):e0287551.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287551. eCollection 2023. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for COVID-19 host genetics studies

Ronaldo Celerino da Silva[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Suelen Cristina de Lima[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wendell Palôma Maria Dos Santos Reis[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Jurandy Júnior Ferraz de Magalhães[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Ronaldo Nascimento de Oliveira Magalhães[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Brijesh Rathi[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Alain Kohl[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Marcos André Cavalcanti Bezerra[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Lindomar Pena[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in global shortages in supplies for diagnostic tests, especially in the developing world. Risk factors for COVID-19 severity include pre-existing comorbidities, older age and male sex, but other variables are likely play a role in disease outcome. There is indeed increasing evidence that supports the role of host genetics in the predisposition to COVID-19 outcomes. The identification of genetic factors associated with the course of SARS-CoV-2 infections relies on DNA extraction methods. This study compared three DNA extraction methods (Chelex®100 resin, phenol-chloroform and the QIAamp DNA extraction kit) for COVID-19 host genetic studies using nasopharyngeal samples from patients. The methods were compared regarding number of required steps for execution, sample handling time, quality and quantity of the extracted material and application in genetic studies. The Chelex®100 method was found to be cheapest (33 and 13 times cheaper than the commercial kit and phenol-chloroform, respectively), give the highest DNA yield (306 and 69 times higher than the commercial kit and phenol-chloroform, respectively), with the least handling steps while providing adequate DNA quality for downstream applications. Together, our results show that the Chelex®100 resin is an inexpensive, safe, simple, fast, and suitable method for DNA extraction of nasopharyngeal samples from COVID-19 patients for genetics studies. This is particularly relevant in developing countries where cost and handling are critical steps in material processing.


 
Back
Top Bottom