• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . Discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 infected patient samples by detection dogs: A proof of concept study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0250158.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250158. eCollection 2021.
Discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 infected patient samples by detection dogs: A proof of concept study


Jennifer L Essler[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sarah A Kane[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pat Nolan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Elikplim H Akaho[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Amalia Z Berna[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Annemarie DeAngelo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Richard A Berk[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Patricia Kaynaroglu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Victoria L Plymouth[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ian D Frank[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Susan R Weiss[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Audrey R Odom John[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Cynthia M Otto[SUP] 1 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

While the world awaits a widely available COVID-19 vaccine, availability of testing is limited in many regions and can be further compounded by shortages of reagents, prolonged processing time and delayed results. One approach to rapid testing is to leverage the volatile organic compound (VOC) signature of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Detection dogs, a biological sensor of VOCs, were utilized to investigate whether SARS-CoV-2 positive urine and saliva patient samples had a unique odor signature. The virus was inactivated in all training samples with either detergent or heat treatment. Using detergent-inactivated urine samples, dogs were initially trained to find samples collected from hospitalized patients confirmed with SARS-CoV-2 infection, while ignoring samples collected from controls. Dogs were then tested on their ability to spontaneously recognize heat-treated urine samples as well as heat-treated saliva from hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. Dogs successfully discriminated between infected and uninfected urine samples, regardless of the inactivation protocol, as well as heat-treated saliva samples. Generalization to novel samples was limited, particularly after intensive training with a restricted sample set. A unique odor associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection present in human urine as well as saliva, provides impetus for the development of odor-based screening, either by electronic, chemical, or biological sensing methods. The use of dogs for screening in an operational setting will require training with a large number of novel SARS-CoV-2 positive and confirmed negative samples.
 
At the time, or it is established that certain scientific research, did not have to be, for the case cited, that was passed before what type of commission?

For some, death has a smell, do we make dogs to detect it?

by the way, what happens when the dogs have been in contact, their capacities are the same?

So we vaccinate them before and how, because given the vaccines in use the olfactory cells will be protected?
 
Back
Top Bottom