• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . Humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines: Role of past infection

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0259703.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259703. eCollection 2021.
Humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines: Role of past infection


Ashley N Gray[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rachel Martin-Blais[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Nicole H Tobin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yan Wang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sarah L Brooker[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Fan Li[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Adva Gadoth[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Julie Elliott[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Emmanuelle Faure-Kumar[SUP] 3 5 [/SUP], Megan Halbrook[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Christian Hofmann[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Saman Kashani[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Clayton Kazan[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Otto O Yang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jennifer A Fulcher[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kathie Grovit-Ferbas[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Anne W Rimoin[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Grace M Aldrovandi[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Two mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are globally authorized as a two-dose regimen. Understanding the magnitude and duration of protective immune responses is vital to curbing the pandemic. We enrolled 461 high-risk health services workers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and first responders in the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD) to assess the humoral responses in previously infected (PI) and infection naïve (NPI) individuals to mRNA-based vaccines (BNT162b2/Pfizer- BioNTech or mRNA-1273/Moderna). A chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay was used to detect antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Spike in vaccinees prior to (n = 21) and following each vaccine dose (n = 246 following dose 1 and n = 315 following dose 2), and at days 31-60 (n = 110) and 61-90 (n = 190) following completion of the 2-dose series. Both vaccines induced robust antibody responses in all immunocompetent individuals. Previously infected individuals achieved higher median peak titers (p = 0.002) and had a slower rate of decay (p = 0.047) than infection-naïve individuals. mRNA-1273 vaccinated infection-naïve individuals demonstrated modestly higher titers following each dose (p = 0.005 and p = 0.029, respectively) and slower rates of antibody decay (p = 0.003) than those who received BNT162b2. A subset of previously infected individuals (25%) required both doses in order to reach peak antibody titers. The biologic significance of the differences between previously infected individuals and between the mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccines remains uncertain, but may have important implications for booster strategies.
 
Back
Top Bottom