• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Prospective evaluation of three rapid molecular tests for seasonal influenza in patients presenting at an emergency unit

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Virol. 2019 Jan 7;111:29-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.01.003. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Prospective evaluation of three rapid molecular tests for seasonal influenza in patients presenting at an emergency unit.[/h] Valentin T[SUP]1[/SUP], Kieslinger P[SUP]2[/SUP], Stelzl E[SUP]3[/SUP], Santner BI[SUP]3[/SUP], Groselj-Strele A[SUP]4[/SUP], Kessler HH[SUP]3[/SUP], Tiran B[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] For infection control measures, rapid accurate diagnostics on admission of patients with suspected seasonal influenza is crucial.
[h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] Prospective comparison of three rapid molecular tests for detection of influenza A/B RNA.
[h=4]STUDY DESIGN:[/h] Outpatients presenting at the Medical emergency department of Graz University Hospital with influenza-like illness and a requirement for hospitalization (n = 312) were studied. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected with the 3 mL-version of the UTM? Viral Transport Medium (Copan). Specimens were tested for influenza A and B RNA using the Alere? i Influenza A & B (Abbott), the cobas[SUP]?[/SUP] Influenza A/B (Roche), and the Xpert[SUP]?[/SUP] Xpress Flu/RSV (Cepheid) tests. Results were compared to those obtained from the same specimen by the Influenza A/B R-GENE[SUP]?[/SUP] (bioMerieux) test based on real-time PCR as reference method.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Overall sensitivities of the Abbott, Roche, and Cepheid tests were 90.5%, 96.0%, and 97.0%, overall specificities 99.4%, 97.6%, and 98.2% respectively. With the Abbott and the Cepheid tests, all specimens gave valid results, while the Roche test showed invalid results in 37 (12.1%) specimens. Total time to result for the Abbott, Roche, and Cepheid tests was 18 min, 22 min, and 32 min respectively.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] The Abbott test lacked sensitivity, the Roche test was impaired by a high number of invalid results. Overall, despite the longest total time to result, the Cepheid test showed the best performance to detect influenza virus RNA in symptomatic patients presenting at an emergency unit in this study.
Copyright ? 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Alere? i A & B; Cobas? liat? influenza A/B; Infection control; Influenza A; Influenza B; Xpert? xpress Flu/RSV

PMID: 30639844 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.01.003
 
Back
Top Bottom