tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018 May 16;7(1):87. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0086-1.
[h=1]Prospective surveillance for influenza. virus in Chinese swine farms.[/h] Anderson BD[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Ma MJ[SUP]3[/SUP], Wang GL[SUP]3[/SUP], Bi ZQ[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Lu B[SUP]6[/SUP], Wang XJ[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Wang CX[SUP]7[/SUP], Chen SH[SUP]6[/SUP], Qian YH[SUP]6[/SUP], Song SX[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Li M[SUP]7[/SUP], Zhao T[SUP]3[/SUP], Wu MN[SUP]3[/SUP], Borkenhagen LK[SUP]1[/SUP], Cao WC[SUP]3[/SUP], Gray GC[SUP]8,[/SUP][SUP]9,[/SUP][SUP]10[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Pork production in China is rapidly increasing and swine production operations are expanding in size and number. However, the biosecurity measures necessary to prevent swine disease transmission, particularly influenza. viruses (IAV) that can be zoonotic, are often inadequate. Despite this risk, few studies have attempted to comprehensively study IAV ecology in swine production settings. Here, we present environmental and animal sampling data collected in the first year of an ongoing five-year prospective epidemiological study to assess IAV ecology as it relates to swine workers, their pigs, and the farm environment. From March 2015 to February 2016, we collected 396 each of environmental swab, water, bioaerosol, and fecal/slurry samples, as well as 3300 pig oral secretion samples from six farms in China. The specimens were tested with molecular assays for IAV. Of these, 46 (11.6%) environmental swab, 235 (7.1%) pig oral secretion, 23 (5.8%) water, 20 (5.1%) bioaerosol, and 19 (4.8%) fecal/slurry specimens were positive for influenza. by qRT-PCR. Risk factors for IAV detection among collected samples were identified using bivariate logistic regression. Overall, these first year data suggest that IAV is quite ubiquitous in the swine production environment and demonstrate an association between the different types of environmental sampling used. Given the mounting evidence that some of these viruses freely move between pigs and swine workers, and that mixing of these viruses can yield progeny viruses with pandemic potential, it seems imperative that routine surveillance for novel IAVs be conducted in commercial swine farms.
PMID: 29765021 DOI: 10.1038/s41426-018-0086-1
[h=1]Prospective surveillance for influenza. virus in Chinese swine farms.[/h] Anderson BD[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Ma MJ[SUP]3[/SUP], Wang GL[SUP]3[/SUP], Bi ZQ[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Lu B[SUP]6[/SUP], Wang XJ[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Wang CX[SUP]7[/SUP], Chen SH[SUP]6[/SUP], Qian YH[SUP]6[/SUP], Song SX[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Li M[SUP]7[/SUP], Zhao T[SUP]3[/SUP], Wu MN[SUP]3[/SUP], Borkenhagen LK[SUP]1[/SUP], Cao WC[SUP]3[/SUP], Gray GC[SUP]8,[/SUP][SUP]9,[/SUP][SUP]10[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Pork production in China is rapidly increasing and swine production operations are expanding in size and number. However, the biosecurity measures necessary to prevent swine disease transmission, particularly influenza. viruses (IAV) that can be zoonotic, are often inadequate. Despite this risk, few studies have attempted to comprehensively study IAV ecology in swine production settings. Here, we present environmental and animal sampling data collected in the first year of an ongoing five-year prospective epidemiological study to assess IAV ecology as it relates to swine workers, their pigs, and the farm environment. From March 2015 to February 2016, we collected 396 each of environmental swab, water, bioaerosol, and fecal/slurry samples, as well as 3300 pig oral secretion samples from six farms in China. The specimens were tested with molecular assays for IAV. Of these, 46 (11.6%) environmental swab, 235 (7.1%) pig oral secretion, 23 (5.8%) water, 20 (5.1%) bioaerosol, and 19 (4.8%) fecal/slurry specimens were positive for influenza. by qRT-PCR. Risk factors for IAV detection among collected samples were identified using bivariate logistic regression. Overall, these first year data suggest that IAV is quite ubiquitous in the swine production environment and demonstrate an association between the different types of environmental sampling used. Given the mounting evidence that some of these viruses freely move between pigs and swine workers, and that mixing of these viruses can yield progeny viruses with pandemic potential, it seems imperative that routine surveillance for novel IAVs be conducted in commercial swine farms.
PMID: 29765021 DOI: 10.1038/s41426-018-0086-1