• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Radiol Med . Cross-sectional analysis of follow-up chest MRI and chest CT scans in patients previously affected by COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Radiol Med


. 2021 Jul 12.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01390-4. Online ahead of print.
Cross-sectional analysis of follow-up chest MRI and chest CT scans in patients previously affected by COVID-19


Martina Pecoraro[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stefano Cipollari[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Livia Marchitelli[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Emanuele Messina[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Maurizio Del Monte[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nicola Galea[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Maria Rosa Ciardi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Marco Francone[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Carlo Catalano[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Valeria Panebianco[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the agreement between chest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) and to assess the diagnostic performance of chest MRI relative to that of CT during the follow-up of patients recovered from coronavirus disease 2019.
Materials and methods: Fifty-two patients underwent both follow-up chest CT and MRI scans, evaluated for ground-glass opacities (GGOs), consolidation, interlobular septal thickening, fibrosis, pleural indentation, vessel enlargement, bronchiolar ectasia, and changes compared to prior CT scans. DWI/ADC was evaluated for signal abnormalities suspicious for inflammation. Agreement between CT and MRI was assessed with Cohen's k and weighted k. Measures of diagnostic accuracy of MRI were calculated.
Results: The agreement between CT and MRI was almost perfect for consolidation (k = 1.00) and change from prior CT (k = 0.857); substantial for predominant pattern (k = 0.764) and interlobular septal thickening (k = 0.734); and poor for GGOs (k = 0.339), fibrosis (k = 0.224), pleural indentation (k = 0.231), and vessel enlargement (k = 0.339). Meanwhile, the sensitivity of MRI was high for GGOs (1.00), interlobular septal thickening (1.00), and consolidation (1.00) but poor for fibrotic changes (0.18), pleural indentation (0.23), and vessel enlargement (0.50) and the specificity was overall high. DWI was positive in 46.0% of cases.
Conclusions: The agreement between MRI and CT was overall good. MRI was very sensitive for GGOs, consolidation and interlobular septal thickening and overall specific for most findings. DWI could be a reputable imaging biomarker of inflammatory activity.

Keywords: COVID-19; Chest computerized tomography; Chest magnetic resonance imaging; Pneumonia.
 
Back
Top Bottom