• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Retrospective forecasting of the 2010-2014 Melbourne influenza seasons using multiple surveillance systems

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Epidemiol Infect. 2016 Sep 27:1-14. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Retrospective forecasting of the 2010-2014 Melbourne influenza seasons using multiple surveillance systems.[/h] Moss R[SUP]1[/SUP], Zarebski A[SUP]2[/SUP], Dawson P[SUP]3[/SUP], McCAW JM[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Accurate forecasting of seasonal influenza epidemics is of great concern to healthcare providers in temperate climates, since these epidemics vary substantially in their size, timing and duration from year to year, making it a challenge to deliver timely and proportionate responses. Previous studies have shown that Bayesian estimation techniques can accurately predict when an influenza epidemic will peak many weeks in advance, and we have previously tailored these methods for metropolitan Melbourne (Australia) and Google Flu Trends data. Here we extend these methods to clinical observation and laboratory-confirmation data for Melbourne, on the grounds that these data sources provide more accurate characterizations of influenza activity. We show that from each of these data sources we can accurately predict the timing of the epidemic peak 4-6 weeks in advance. We also show that making simultaneous use of multiple surveillance systems to improve forecast skill remains a fundamental challenge. Disparate systems provide complementary characterizations of disease activity, which may or may not be comparable, and it is unclear how a 'ground truth' for evaluating forecasts against these multiple characterizations might be defined. These findings are a significant step towards making optimal use of routine surveillance data for outbreak forecasting.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Bayesian prediction; epidemic; forecasting; influenza

PMID: 27671159 DOI: 10.1017/S0950268816002053
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom