• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sci Rep . Saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 serology using at-home collection kits returned via mail

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Rep


. 2022 Aug 18;12(1):14061.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17057-7.
Saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 serology using at-home collection kits returned via mail


Christopher Campbell[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Douglas Roblin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Nikhil Padmanabhan[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Daniel Romero[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jessica Joe[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Lily Fathi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Thomas Whiting[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jared Williamson[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Paul Goodwin[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Charmaine Mckie[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Adrienne Deneal[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Leslie Greenberg[SUP] 3 [/SUP], George Sigal[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Serology provides tools for epidemiologic studies, and may have a role in vaccine prioritization and selection. Automated serologic testing of saliva, especially specimens that are self-collected at home and sent to a laboratory via the mail without refrigeration, could be a highly-scalable strategy for population-wide testing. In this prospective study, non-vaccinated patients were recruited after PCR testing to self-collect saliva and return their specimens via mail. Longitudinal specimens were analyzed in order to monitor seroconversion in the weeks after a diagnostic PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Diverse users self-collected saliva and returned specimens via mail in compliance with shipping regulations. At our pre-established threshold (0.963 AU/mL), salivary IgG reactivity to full-length spike protein achieved 95.8% sensitivity and 92.4% specificity at 2-4 weeks after diagnostic testing, which is comparable to the typical sensitivity and specificity achieved for serum testing. Reactivity to N antigen also was detected with 92.6% sensitivity and 90.7% specificity at 4-8 weeks after diagnostic testing. Moreover, serologic testing for endemic coronaviruses performed in multiplex with SARS-CoV-2 antigens has the potential to identify samples that may require retesting due to effects of pre-analytical factors. The easy-to-use saliva collection kit, coupled with thresholds for positivity and methods of flagging samples for retest, provides a framework for large-scale serosurveillance of SARS-CoV-2.
 
Back
Top Bottom