• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sci Total Environ . Impact of City Lockdown on the Air Quality of COVID-19-hit of Wuhan City

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Total Environ


. 2020 Jun 30;742:140556.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140556. Online ahead of print.
Impact of City Lockdown on the Air Quality of COVID-19-hit of Wuhan City


Xinbo Lian[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jianping Huang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Rujin Huang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Chuwei Liu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lina Wang[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Tinghan Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

A series of strict lockdown measures were implemented in the areas of China worst affected by coronavirus disease 19, including Wuhan, to prevent the disease spreading. The lockdown had a substantial environmental impact, because traffic pollution and industrial emissions are important factors affecting air quality and public health in the region. After the lockdown, the average monthly air quality index (AQI) in Wuhan was 59.7, which is 33.9% lower than that before the lockdown (January 23, 2020) and 47.5% lower than that during the corresponding period (113.6) from 2015 to 2019. Compared with the conditions before the lockdown, fine particulate matter (PM[SUB]2.5[/SUB]) decreased by 36.9% and remained the main pollutant. Nitrogen dioxide (NO[SUB]2[/SUB]) showed the largest decrease of approximately 53.3%, and ozone (O[SUB]3[/SUB]) increased by 116.6%. The proportions of fixed-source emissions and transported external-source emissions in this area increased. After the lockdown, O[SUB]3[/SUB] pollution was highly negatively correlated with the NO[SUB]2[/SUB] concentration, and the radiation increase caused by the PM[SUB]2.5[/SUB] reduction was not the main reason for the increase in O[SUB]3[/SUB]. This indicates that the generation of secondary pollutants is influenced by multiple factors and is not only governed by emission reduction.

Keywords: AQI; COVID-19; Lockdown; NO(2); O(3); PM(2.5).
 
Back
Top Bottom