• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Study of immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a novel inactivated vaccine with chitosan against influenza A/H1N1/2009

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 2012 Mar-Apr;(2):51-4.
[Study of immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a novel inactivated vaccine with chitosan against influenza A/H1N1/2009].
[Article in Russian]
[No authors listed]
Abstract
AIM:

Study of immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a novel inactivated vaccine with chitosan against influenza A/H1N1/2009.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Influenza virus A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) strain was used in the study. Mice were immunized twice (21 day interval) with experimental samples of inactivated influenza vaccine: No. 1--without the addition of chitosan, No. 2--with addition of chitosan. The blood was obtained 21 days after the first and 10 days after the second immunization with the vaccines and was treated with RDE. Antibody levels were evaluated in HI reaction.
RESULTS:

HI reaction method showed that antibody titers induced after immunization of vaccine No. 2 were higher than those induced after immunization with vaccine No. 1. Evaluation of protective efficacy of the vaccines against an experimental form of influenza infection in mice showed that after immunization with vaccine that does not contain chitosan the level of virus accumulation does not differ from the control statistically significantly (p < or = 0.05), at the same time the level of virus accumulation in the lungs of infected animals immunized with chitosan containing vaccine significantly (significantly with 95% probability) decreased by an average 3.01g when compared with control.
CONCLUSION:

Comparative analysis of immunogenicity and protective efficacy of experimental samples of inactivated influenza vaccine against influenza A/H 1N1/2009 showed that the vaccine with the addition of chitosan stimulates the formation of a higher immune response and promotes a more significant suppression of influenza A infectious agent reproduction in the lung target-organ.

PMID:
22693811
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22693811
 
Back
Top Bottom