• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Therapie Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine in the Management of COVID-19: Much Kerfuffle but Little Evidence

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Therapie


. 2020 May 23;S0040-5957(20)30100-1.
doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2020.05.010. Online ahead of print.
Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine in the Management of COVID-19: Much Kerfuffle but Little Evidence


M Roustit[SUP] 1 [/SUP], R Guilhaumou[SUP] 2 [/SUP], M Molimard[SUP] 3 [/SUP], M-D Drici[SUP] 4 [/SUP], S Laporte[SUP] 5 [/SUP], J-L Montastruc[SUP] 6 [/SUP], French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (SFPT)



Affiliations

Abstract

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are drugs that have shown in vitro activity on the replication of certain coronaviruses. In the context of the SARS-Cov-2 epidemic, the virus responsible for the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), these two drugs have been proposed as possible treatments. The results of the first clinical studies evaluating the effect of hydroxychloroquine do not support any efficacy of this drug in patients with COVID-19, due to major methodological weaknesses. Yet, these preliminary studies have aroused considerable media interest, raising fears of massive and uncontrolled use. In the absence of evidence of clinical benefits, the main risk is of exposing patients unnecessarily to the well-known adverse effects of hydroxychloroquine, with a possibly increased risk in the specific setting of COVID-19. In addition, widespread use outside of any recommendation risks compromising the completion of good quality clinical trials. The chloroquine hype, fueled by low-quality studies and media announcements, has yielded to the implementation of more than 150 studies worldwide. This represents a waste of resources and a loss of opportunity for other drugs to be properly evaluated. In the context of emergency, rigorous trials are more than ever needed in order to have, as soon as possible, reliable data on drugs that are possibly effective against the disease. Meanwhile, serious adverse drug reactions have been reported in patients with COVID-19 receiving hydroxychloroquine, justifying to limit its prescription, and to perform suitable cardiac and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Keywords: COVID-19; Chloroquine; Coronavirus; Hydroxychloroquine; SARS-Cov-2.
 
Back
Top Bottom