Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster.
The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website.
By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.
FAA seeks proposals to create six US drone test sites
WASHINGTON | Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:17pm EST
(Reuters) - The Federal Aviation Administration on Thursday asked for proposals to develop six research and test sites for unmanned aircraft systems, or drones, around the United States.
Re: USA - FAA seeks proposals to create 6 drone test sites - What Privacy?
The Drones Come Home
By John Horgan
snip
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) worries that as drones become cheaper and more reliable, law enforcement agencies may be tempted to carry out persistent surveillance of U.S. citizens. The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution protects Americans from ?unreasonable searches and seizures,? but it?s not clear how courts will apply that to drones.
What Jay Stanley of the ACLU calls his ?nightmare scenario? begins with drones supporting ?mostly unobjectionable? police raids and chases. Soon, however, networks of linked drones and computers ?gain the ability to automatically track multiple vehicles and bodies as they move around a city,? much as the cell phone network hands calls from one tower to the next. The nightmare climaxes with authorities combining drone video and cell phone tracking to build up databases of people?s routine comings and goings?databases they can then mine for suspicious behavior. Stanley?s nightmare doesn?t even include the possibility that police drones might be armed.
