• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccine . Influenza vaccination in Japanese children, 2024/25: Effectiveness of inactivated vaccine and limited use of newly introduced live-attenu

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine


. 2025 Jun 26:61:127429.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127429. Online ahead of print. Influenza vaccination in Japanese children, 2024/25: Effectiveness of inactivated vaccine and limited use of newly introduced live-attenuated vaccine

Masayoshi Shinjoh[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kazuyo Tamura[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yoshio Yamaguchi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Hiroyuki Fukushima[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Naoki Kuremoto[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Maika Tezuka[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Naoya Fukushima[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Makoto Yoshida[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Motoko Shimoyamada[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Noriko Suzuki[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Ryo Itaki[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Michiko Chiga[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Ken Kobayashi[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Kenichiro Tsunematsu[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Mitsuhiro Nishida[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Go Yamada[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Akimichi Shibata[SUP] 17 [/SUP], Atsushi Narabayashi[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Akinobu Kamei[SUP] 19 [/SUP], Naonori Maeda[SUP] 20 [/SUP], Yuki Tsumura[SUP] 21 [/SUP], Mizuki Yaginuma[SUP] 22 [/SUP], Munehiro Furuichi[SUP] 23 [/SUP], Chiharu Kawakami[SUP] 24 [/SUP], Satoshi Narumi[SUP] 25 [/SUP], Norio Sugaya[SUP] 26 [/SUP]; Keio Pediatric Influenza Research Group



Affiliations
Abstract

This study evaluated influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) among children in Japan during the 2024/25 season, when A(H1N1)pdm09 predominated and live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) was introduced for the first time. Using a test-negative design, febrile children aged 6 months to 15 years were enrolled from 16 hospitals and 2 clinics. Among 1351 participants, LAIV coverage was low (1.2 %), limiting its VE assessment. In contrast, inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) coverage was 35 %. The adjusted VE of IIV against influenza A was 73 % (95 % CI: 57-83 %) in inpatients and 57 % (24-75 %) in outpatients. VE was significant in younger age groups. A two-dose regimen provided no additional benefit. The effectiveness observed was consistent with previous seasons and global estimates. While the effectiveness of LAIV was unevaluable due to low coverage, IIV remained effective, supporting its continued use in pediatric populations. LAIV effectiveness should be re-evaluated if coverage increases.

Keywords: Children; Effectiveness; Inactivated vaccine; Influenza; Influenza vaccine; Live vaccine; Test-negative design.

 
Back
Top Bottom