tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccines (Basel)
. 2022 Jun 28;10(7):1040.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines10071040.
Transmission of H9N2 Low Pathogenicity Avian Influenza Virus (LPAIV) in a Challenge-Transmission Model
Sugandha Raj[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jake Astill[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Nadiyah Alqazlan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nitish Boodhoo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Douglas C Hodgins[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Éva Nagy[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Samira Mubareka[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Khalil Karimi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shayan Sharif[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Migratory birds are major reservoirs for avian influenza viruses (AIV), which can be transmitted to poultry and mammals. The H9N2 subtype of AIV has become prevalent in poultry over the last two decades. Despite that, there is a scarcity of detailed information on how this virus can be transmitted. The current study aimed to establish a direct contact model using seeder chickens infected with H9N2 AIV as a source of the virus for transmission to recipient chickens. Seeder chickens were inoculated with two different inoculation routes either directly or via the aerosol route. The results indicate that inoculation via the aerosol route was more effective at establishing infection compared to the direct inoculation route. Shedding was observed to be higher in aerosol-inoculated seeder chickens, with a greater percentage of chickens being infected at each time point. In terms of transmission, the recipient chickens exposed to the aerosol-inoculated seeder chickens had higher oral and cloacal virus shedding compared to the recipient chickens of the directly inoculated group. Furthermore, the aerosol route of infection resulted in enhanced antibody responses in both seeder and recipient chickens compared to the directly inoculated group. Overall, the results confirmed that the aerosol route is a preferred inoculation route for infecting seeder chickens in a direct contact transmission model.
Keywords: H9N2; chickens; infection; influenza; shedding; transmission; virus.
. 2022 Jun 28;10(7):1040.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines10071040.
Transmission of H9N2 Low Pathogenicity Avian Influenza Virus (LPAIV) in a Challenge-Transmission Model
Sugandha Raj[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jake Astill[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Nadiyah Alqazlan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nitish Boodhoo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Douglas C Hodgins[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Éva Nagy[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Samira Mubareka[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Khalil Karimi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shayan Sharif[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 35891204
- PMCID: PMC9316524
- DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10071040
Abstract
Migratory birds are major reservoirs for avian influenza viruses (AIV), which can be transmitted to poultry and mammals. The H9N2 subtype of AIV has become prevalent in poultry over the last two decades. Despite that, there is a scarcity of detailed information on how this virus can be transmitted. The current study aimed to establish a direct contact model using seeder chickens infected with H9N2 AIV as a source of the virus for transmission to recipient chickens. Seeder chickens were inoculated with two different inoculation routes either directly or via the aerosol route. The results indicate that inoculation via the aerosol route was more effective at establishing infection compared to the direct inoculation route. Shedding was observed to be higher in aerosol-inoculated seeder chickens, with a greater percentage of chickens being infected at each time point. In terms of transmission, the recipient chickens exposed to the aerosol-inoculated seeder chickens had higher oral and cloacal virus shedding compared to the recipient chickens of the directly inoculated group. Furthermore, the aerosol route of infection resulted in enhanced antibody responses in both seeder and recipient chickens compared to the directly inoculated group. Overall, the results confirmed that the aerosol route is a preferred inoculation route for infecting seeder chickens in a direct contact transmission model.
Keywords: H9N2; chickens; infection; influenza; shedding; transmission; virus.