• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Masking Our COVID-19 Concerns

Michael Coston

Editor, Senior Moderator
Masking Our COVID-19 Concerns



#15,169


In late January, in The Man In The Ironed Mask (Revisited), I wrote about the all-but inevitable shortages of PPEs (personal protective equipment) from the looming coronavirus pandemic, and discussed in some depth the research that had been done on homemade, cloth face masks and even provided a link to how to make one.

While studies (see A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers) have shown them to be a poor substitute for disposable PPEs, they are - quite literally - better than nothing.​

Even the CDC agrees - at least for Heath Care workers without access to proper PPEs, as their March 17th Strategies for Optimizing the Supply of Facemasks even allows:

HCP use of homemade masks:

In settings where facemasks are not available, HCP might use homemade masks (e.g., bandana, scarf) for care of patients with COVID-19 as a last resort. However, homemade masks are not considered PPE, since their capability to protect HCP is unknown. Caution should be exercised when considering this option. Homemade masks should ideally be used in combination with a face shield that covers the entire front (that extends to the chin or below) and sides of the face.

The debate over the public wearing of masks continues, and has not yet officially been recommended by the WHO, or the CDC. Frankly, the mixed, and convoluted messaging over why the public shouldn't wear masks (they don't protect against the virus, and should be reserved for HCWs who need them) has diminished their credibility.

The `right' message should have been, we don't have enough disposable PPEs for HCWs, so please make your own masks, and wear them in public, along with washing your hands, social distancing, and the rest of the the standard advice.

Simple, honest, and most people would have accepted the reality.​

Although I don't understand why it has taken two months, in recent days the opinion and advice appears to be changing, as yesterday and overnight we've seen headlines such as:
Those Asian countries (Singapore, Taiwan, Japan, etc.) that encourage the wearing of masks in public are seeing far fewer community cases of COVID-19 than countries that have discouraged the practice. Whether this is due to some degree of protection for the wearer, or to a reduction of virus transmission by infected individuals, the end result is the same.

Masks can help reduce the transmission of the virus. They are far from perfect, but as part of a layered NPI approach (hand washing, social distancing, avoiding touching your face, etc.) they can help reduce the spread of the disease.​

I previously wrote:

While cloth masks from places like Amazon are on backorder, anyone who is handy with a sewing machine can find dozens of tutorials on YouTube on how to make cloth face masks, and I've even seen some `glue gun specials', which don't require sewing skills.

With so many people stuck at home, unable to work, this could be a terrific local cottage industry for a lot of people. To either sell (or better yet) to donate to friends and neighbors.

Although I possess zero sewing skills, and don't own a sewing machine, I managed to cobble together a serviceable face mask yesterday at home, using an old pillow case, some thin elastic bands, and a glue gun in about 20 minutes.

The photo at the top is the front of the mask, you can see the reverse below:

I even glued a metallic nose strip using a piece from an old, used N95. A stiff piece of wire would probably have worked as well. It admittedly isn't pretty, but I expect version 2.0 will be slightly better.

The point is, if I can make one, you can make one.

And since COVID-19 is likely to be with us for some time to come, and the public wearing of masks may soon become de rigueur, you might want to try your hand at making some yourself.
 
A very informative article on how to reuse N95 masks, by the man who helped develop them:
https://utrf.tennessee.edu/informat...tection-sterilization-of-face-mask-materials/

Key takeaway is that alcohol destroys the filter's efficiency. The filter medium in the mask carries a charge, which alcohol dissipates.
However, steam, brief boiling or dry heat (hairdrier level, around 150*F) are all acceptable alternatives with minimal efficiency loss.
 
A very informative article on how to reuse N95 masks, by the man who helped develop them:
https://utrf.tennessee.edu/informat...tection-sterilization-of-face-mask-materials/

Key takeaway is that alcohol destroys the filter's efficiency. The filter medium in the mask carries a charge, which alcohol dissipates.
However, steam, brief boiling or dry heat (hairdrier level, around 150*F) are all acceptable alternatives with minimal efficiency loss.

Thank you etudiant

Temperature in Celsius and a note about being careful not to touch the mask on to hot metal surfaces. https://utrf.tennessee.edu/informat...tection-sterilization-of-face-mask-materials/

"exposing the masks to air at elevated temperatures such as 70℃ for 30 minutes allows the charges to be retained. With this method, it is important to suspend the masks in air without contacting or approaching a metal surface because the metal temperature is much higher than that of the hot air leading to a severe charge decay or damage of the mask material."
 
What a great set of posts. Thank you everyone. If the outside layer of surgical masks is waterproof - would spray waterproofer (c6 fluoro type) on the outside make the mask even more efficient?
 
What a great set of posts. Thank you everyone. If the outside layer of surgical masks is waterproof - would spray waterproofer (c6 fluoro type) on the outside make the mask even more efficient?

Do not know the answer, but I'd worry that the waterproofing medium would allow the charged mask material to discharge.
That charge makes the difference between 95% and 65% efficiency, so keeping it intact is essential. That also indicates it is not the physical barrier that does the main work.
 
On the topic of heat inactivation there is this study brought to our attention by Tetano on the Inactivation of coronaviruses by heat https://flutrackers.com/forum/forum/...iruses-by-heat

"A total of 10 studies with original data were found. Overall a thermal disinfection at 60?C for 30 min, 65?C for 15 min and 80?C for 1 min was effective to strongly reduce coronavirus infectivity by at least 4 log10

The paper also suggests "the numbers of re-uses should be traced (mark at the side of mask per cycle)"
 
Back
Top Bottom